Author: sainath

  • Snowflake SQL Tutorial: Master MERGE ALL BY NAME in 2025

    Snowflake SQL Tutorial: Master MERGE ALL BY NAME in 2025

    Revolutionary SQL Features That Transform data engineering

    In 2025, Snowflake has introduced groundbreaking improvements that fundamentally change how data engineers write queries. This Snowflake SQL tutorial covers the latest features including MERGE ALL BY NAME, UNION BY NAME, and Cortex AISQL. Whether you’re learning Snowflake SQL or optimizing existing code, this tutorial demonstrates how these enhancements eliminate tedious column mapping, reduce errors, and dramatically simplify complex data operations.

    The star feature? MERGE ALL BY NAMEannounced on September 29, 2025—automatically matches columns by name, eliminating the need to manually map every column when upserting data. This Snowflake SQL tutorial will show you how this single feature can transform a 50-line MERGE statement into just 5 lines.

    But that’s not all. Additionally, this SQL tutorial covers:

    • UNION BY NAME for flexible data combining
    • Cortex AISQL for AI-powered SQL functions
    • Enhanced PIVOT/UNPIVOT with aliasing
    • Snowflake Scripting UDFs for procedural SQL
    • Lambda expressions in higher-order functions

    For data engineers, these improvements mean less boilerplate code, fewer errors, and more time focused on solving business problems rather than wrestling with SQL syntax.

    UNION BY NAME combining tables with different schemas and column orders flexibly

    But that’s not all. Additionally, Snowflake 2025 brings:

    • UNION BY NAME for flexible data combining
    • Cortex AISQL for AI-powered SQL functions
    • Enhanced PIVOT/UNPIVOT with aliasing
    • Snowflake Scripting UDFs for procedural SQL
    • Lambda expressions in higher-order functions
    Snowflake Scripting UDF showing procedural logic with conditionals and loops

    For data engineers, these improvements mean less boilerplate code, fewer errors, and more time focused on solving business problems rather than wrestling with SQL syntax.


    Snowflake SQL Tutorial: MERGE ALL BY NAME Feature

    This Snowflake SQL tutorial begins with the most impactful feature of 2025…

    Announced on September 29, 2025, MERGE ALL BY NAME is arguably the most impactful SQL improvement Snowflake has released this year. This feature automatically matches columns between source and target tables based on column names rather than positions.

    The SQL Problem MERGE ALL BY NAME Solves

    Traditionally, writing a MERGE statement required manually listing and mapping each column:

    Productivity comparison showing OLD manual MERGE versus NEW automatic MERGE ALL BY NAME

    sql

    -- OLD WAY: Manual column mapping (tedious and error-prone)
    MERGE INTO customer_target t
    USING customer_updates s
    ON t.customer_id = s.customer_id
    WHEN MATCHED THEN
      UPDATE SET
        t.first_name = s.first_name,
        t.last_name = s.last_name,
        t.email = s.email,
        t.phone = s.phone,
        t.address = s.address,
        t.city = s.city,
        t.state = s.state,
        t.zip_code = s.zip_code,
        t.country = s.country,
        t.updated_date = s.updated_date
    WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN
      INSERT (customer_id, first_name, last_name, email, phone, 
              address, city, state, zip_code, country, updated_date)
      VALUES (s.customer_id, s.first_name, s.last_name, s.email, 
              s.phone, s.address, s.city, s.state, s.zip_code, 
              s.country, s.updated_date);

    This approach suffers from multiple pain points:

    • Manual mapping for every single column
    • High risk of typos and mismatches
    • Difficult maintenance when schemas evolve
    • Time-consuming for tables with many columns

    The Snowflake SQL Solution: MERGE ALL BY NAME

    With MERGE ALL BY NAME, the same operation becomes elegantly simple:

    sql

    -- NEW WAY: Automatic column matching (clean and reliable)
    MERGE INTO customer_target
    USING customer_updates
    ON customer_target.customer_id = customer_updates.customer_id
    WHEN MATCHED THEN
      UPDATE ALL BY NAME
    WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN
      INSERT ALL BY NAME;

    That’s it! Just 2 lines instead of 20+ lines of column mapping.

    How MERGE ALL BY NAME Works

    Snowflake MERGE ALL BY NAME automatically matching columns by name regardless of position

    The magic happens through intelligent column name matching:

    1. Snowflake analyzes both target and source tables
    2. It identifies columns with matching names
    3. It automatically maps columns regardless of position
    4. It handles different column orders seamlessly
    5. It executes the MERGE with proper type conversion

    Importantly, MERGE ALL BY NAME works even when:

    • Columns are in different orders
    • Tables have extra columns in one but not the other
    • Column names use different casing (Snowflake is case-insensitive by default)

    Requirements for MERGE ALL BY NAME

    For this feature to work correctly:

    • Target and source must have the same number of matching columns
    • Column names must be identical (case-insensitive)
    • Data types must be compatible (Snowflake handles automatic casting)

    However, column order doesn’t matter:

    sql

    -- This works perfectly!
    CREATE TABLE target (
      id INT,
      name VARCHAR,
      email VARCHAR,
      created_date DATE
    );
    
    CREATE TABLE source (
      created_date DATE,  -- Different order
      email VARCHAR,       -- Different order
      id INT,             -- Different order
      name VARCHAR        -- Different order
    );
    
    MERGE INTO target
    USING source
    ON target.id = source.id
    WHEN MATCHED THEN UPDATE ALL BY NAME
    WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN INSERT ALL BY NAME;

    Snowflake intelligently matches id with id, name with name, etc., regardless of position.

    Real-World Use Case: Slowly Changing Dimensions

    Consider implementing a Type 1 SCD (Slowly Changing Dimension) for product data:

    sql

    -- Product dimension table
    CREATE OR REPLACE TABLE dim_product (
      product_id INT PRIMARY KEY,
      product_name VARCHAR,
      category VARCHAR,
      price DECIMAL(10,2),
      description VARCHAR,
      supplier_id INT,
      last_updated TIMESTAMP
    );
    
    -- Daily product updates from source system
    CREATE OR REPLACE TABLE product_updates (
      product_id INT,
      description VARCHAR,  -- Different column order
      price DECIMAL(10,2),
      product_name VARCHAR,
      category VARCHAR,
      supplier_id INT,
      last_updated TIMESTAMP
    );
    
    -- SCD Type 1: Upsert with MERGE ALL BY NAME
    MERGE INTO dim_product
    USING product_updates
    ON dim_product.product_id = product_updates.product_id
    WHEN MATCHED THEN
      UPDATE ALL BY NAME
    WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN
      INSERT ALL BY NAME;

    This handles:

    • Updating existing products with latest information
    • Inserting new products automatically
    • Different column orders between systems
    • All columns without manual mapping

    Benefits of MERGE ALL BY NAME

    Data engineers report significant advantages:

    Time Savings:

    • 90% less code for MERGE statements
    • 5 minutes instead of 30 minutes to write complex merges
    • Faster schema evolution without code changes

    Error Reduction:

    • Zero typos from manual column mapping
    • No mismatched columns from copy-paste errors
    • Automatic validation by Snowflake

    Maintenance Simplification:

    • Schema changes don’t require code updates
    • New columns automatically included
    • Removed columns handled gracefully

    Code Readability:

    • Clear intent from simple syntax
    • Easy review in code reviews
    • Self-documenting logic

    Snowflake SQL UNION BY NAME: Flexible Data Combining

    This section of our Snowflake SQL tutorial explores how UNION BY NAME Introduced at Snowflake Summit 2025, UNION BY NAME revolutionizes how we combine datasets from different sources by focusing on column names rather than positions.

    The Traditional UNION Problem

    For years, SQL developers struggled with UNION ALL’s rigid requirements:

    sql

    -- TRADITIONAL UNION ALL: Requires exact column matching
    SELECT id, name, department
    FROM employees
    UNION ALL
    SELECT emp_id, emp_name, dept  -- Different names: FAILS!
    FROM contingent_workers;

    This fails because:

    • Column names don’t match
    • Positions matter, not names
    • Adding columns breaks existing queries
    • Schema evolution requires constant maintenance

    UNION BY NAME Solution

    With UNION BY NAME, column matching happens by name:

    sql

    -- NEW: UNION BY NAME matches columns by name
    CREATE TABLE employees (
      id INT,
      name VARCHAR,
      department VARCHAR,
      role VARCHAR
    );
    
    CREATE TABLE contingent_workers (
      id INT,
      name VARCHAR,
      department VARCHAR
      -- Note: No 'role' column
    );
    
    SELECT * FROM employees
    UNION ALL BY NAME
    SELECT * FROM contingent_workers;
    
    -- Result: Combines by name, fills missing 'role' with NULL

    Output:

    ID | NAME    | DEPARTMENT | ROLE
    ---+---------+------------+--------
    1  | Alice   | Sales      | Manager
    2  | Bob     | IT         | Developer
    3  | Charlie | Sales      | NULL
    4  | Diana   | IT         | NULL

    Key behaviors:

    • Columns matched by name, not position
    • Missing columns filled with NULL
    • Extra columns included automatically
    • Order doesn’t matter

    Use Cases for UNION BY NAME

    This feature excels in several scenarios:

    Merging Legacy and Modern Systems:

    sql

    -- Legacy system with old column names
    SELECT 
      cust_id AS customer_id,
      cust_name AS name,
      phone_num AS phone
    FROM legacy_customers
    
    UNION ALL BY NAME
    
    -- Modern system with new column names
    SELECT
      customer_id,
      name,
      phone,
      email  -- New column not in legacy
    FROM modern_customers;

    Combining Data from Multiple Regions:

    sql

    -- Different regions have different optional fields
    SELECT * FROM us_sales        -- Has 'state' column
    UNION ALL BY NAME
    SELECT * FROM eu_sales        -- Has 'country' column
    UNION ALL BY NAME
    SELECT * FROM asia_sales;     -- Has 'region' column

    Incremental Schema Evolution:

    sql

    -- Historical data without new fields
    SELECT * FROM sales_2023
    
    UNION ALL BY NAME
    
    -- Current data with additional tracking
    SELECT * FROM sales_2024      -- Added 'source_channel' column
    
    UNION ALL BY NAME
    
    SELECT * FROM sales_2025;     -- Added 'attribution_id' column

    Performance Considerations

    While powerful, UNION BY NAME has slight overhead:

    When to use UNION BY NAME:

    • Schemas differ across sources
    • Evolution happens frequently
    • Maintainability matters more than marginal performance

    When to use traditional UNION ALL:

    • Schemas are identical and stable
    • Maximum performance is critical
    • Large-scale production queries with billions of rows

    Best practice: Use UNION BY NAME for data integration and ELT pipelines where flexibility outweighs marginal performance costs.


    Cortex AISQL: AI-Powered SQL Functions

    Announced on June 2, 2025, Cortex AISQL brings powerful AI capabilities directly into Snowflake’s SQL engine, enabling AI pipelines with familiar SQL commands.

    Revolutionary AI Functions

    Cortex AISQL introduces three groundbreaking SQL functions:

    AI_FILTER: Intelligent Data Filtering

    Filter data using natural language questions instead of complex WHERE clauses:

    sql

    -- Traditional approach: Complex WHERE clause
    SELECT *
    FROM customer_reviews
    WHERE (
      LOWER(review_text) LIKE '%excellent%' OR
      LOWER(review_text) LIKE '%amazing%' OR
      LOWER(review_text) LIKE '%outstanding%' OR
      LOWER(review_text) LIKE '%fantastic%'
    ) AND (
      sentiment_score > 0.7
    );
    
    -- AI_FILTER approach: Natural language
    SELECT *
    FROM customer_reviews
    WHERE AI_FILTER(review_text, 'Is this a positive review praising the product?');

    Use cases:

    • Filtering images by content (“Does this image contain a person?”)
    • Classifying text by intent (“Is this a complaint?”)
    • Quality control (“Is this product photo high quality?”)

    AI_CLASSIFY: Intelligent Classification

    Classify text or images into user-defined categories:

    sql

    -- Classify customer support tickets automatically
    SELECT 
      ticket_id,
      subject,
      AI_CLASSIFY(
        description,
        ['Technical Issue', 'Billing Question', 'Feature Request', 
         'Bug Report', 'Account Access']
      ) AS ticket_category
    FROM support_tickets;
    
    -- Multi-label classification
    SELECT
      product_id,
      AI_CLASSIFY(
        product_description,
        ['Electronics', 'Clothing', 'Home & Garden', 'Sports'],
        'multi_label'
      ) AS categories
    FROM products;

    Advantages:

    • No training required
    • Plain-language category definitions
    • Single or multi-label classification
    • Works on text and images

    AI_AGG: Intelligent Aggregation

    Aggregate text columns and extract insights across multiple rows:

    sql

    -- Traditional: Difficult to get insights from text
    SELECT 
      product_id,
      STRING_AGG(review_text, ' | ')  -- Just concatenates
    FROM reviews
    GROUP BY product_id;
    
    -- AI_AGG: Extract meaningful insights
    SELECT
      product_id,
      AI_AGG(
        review_text,
        'Summarize the common themes in these reviews, highlighting both positive and negative feedback'
      ) AS review_summary
    FROM reviews
    GROUP BY product_id;

    Key benefit: Not subject to context window limitations—can process unlimited rows.

    Cortex AISQL Real-World Example

    Complete pipeline for analyzing customer feedback:

    Real-world Cortex AISQL pipeline filtering, classifying, and aggregating customer feedback

    sql

    -- Step 1: Filter relevant feedback
    CREATE OR REPLACE TABLE relevant_feedback AS
    SELECT *
    FROM customer_feedback
    WHERE AI_FILTER(feedback_text, 'Is this feedback about product quality or features?');
    
    -- Step 2: Classify feedback by category
    CREATE OR REPLACE TABLE categorized_feedback AS
    SELECT
      feedback_id,
      customer_id,
      AI_CLASSIFY(
        feedback_text,
        ['Product Quality', 'Feature Request', 'User Experience', 
         'Performance', 'Pricing']
      ) AS feedback_category,
      feedback_text
    FROM relevant_feedback;
    
    -- Step 3: Aggregate insights by category
    SELECT
      feedback_category,
      COUNT(*) AS feedback_count,
      AI_AGG(
        feedback_text,
        'Summarize the key points from this feedback, identifying the top 3 issues or requests mentioned'
      ) AS category_insights
    FROM categorized_feedback
    GROUP BY feedback_category;

    This replaces:

    • Hours of manual review
    • Complex NLP pipelines with external tools
    • Expensive ML model training and deployment

    Enhanced PIVOT and UNPIVOT with Aliases

    Snowflake 2025 adds aliasing capabilities to PIVOT and UNPIVOT operations, improving readability and flexibility.

    PIVOT with Column Aliases

    Now you can specify aliases for pivot column names:

    sql

    -- Sample data: Monthly sales by product
    CREATE OR REPLACE TABLE monthly_sales (
      product VARCHAR,
      month VARCHAR,
      sales_amount DECIMAL(10,2)
    );
    
    INSERT INTO monthly_sales VALUES
      ('Laptop', 'Jan', 50000),
      ('Laptop', 'Feb', 55000),
      ('Laptop', 'Mar', 60000),
      ('Phone', 'Jan', 30000),
      ('Phone', 'Feb', 35000),
      ('Phone', 'Mar', 40000);
    
    -- PIVOT with aliases for readable column names
    SELECT *
    FROM monthly_sales
    PIVOT (
      SUM(sales_amount)
      FOR month IN ('Jan', 'Feb', 'Mar')
    ) AS pivot_alias (
      product,
      january_sales,      -- Custom alias instead of 'Jan'
      february_sales,     -- Custom alias instead of 'Feb'
      march_sales         -- Custom alias instead of 'Mar'
    );

    Output:

    PRODUCT | JANUARY_SALES | FEBRUARY_SALES | MARCH_SALES
    --------+---------------+----------------+-------------
    Laptop  | 50000         | 55000          | 60000
    Phone   | 30000         | 35000          | 40000

    Benefits:

    • Readable column names
    • Business-friendly output
    • Easier downstream consumption
    • Better documentation

    UNPIVOT with Aliases

    Similarly, UNPIVOT now supports aliases:

    sql

    -- Unpivot with custom column names
    SELECT *
    FROM pivot_sales_data
    UNPIVOT (
      monthly_amount
      FOR sales_month IN (q1_sales, q2_sales, q3_sales, q4_sales)
    ) AS unpivot_alias (
      product_name,
      quarter,
      amount
    );

    Snowflake Scripting UDFs: Procedural SQL

    A major enhancement in 2025 allows creating SQL UDFs with Snowflake Scripting procedural language.

    Traditional UDF Limitations

    Before, SQL UDFs were limited to single expressions:

    sql

    -- Simple UDF: No procedural logic allowed
    CREATE FUNCTION calculate_discount(price FLOAT, discount_pct FLOAT)
    RETURNS FLOAT
    AS
    $$
      price * (1 - discount_pct / 100)
    $$;

    New: Snowflake Scripting UDFs

    Now you can include loops, conditionals, and complex logic:

    sql

    CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION calculate_tiered_commission(
      sales_amount FLOAT
    )
    RETURNS FLOAT
    LANGUAGE SQL
    AS
    $$
    DECLARE
      commission FLOAT;
    BEGIN
      -- Tiered commission logic
      IF (sales_amount < 10000) THEN
        commission := sales_amount * 0.05;  -- 5%
      ELSEIF (sales_amount < 50000) THEN
        commission := (10000 * 0.05) + ((sales_amount - 10000) * 0.08);  -- 8%
      ELSE
        commission := (10000 * 0.05) + (40000 * 0.08) + ((sales_amount - 50000) * 0.10);  -- 10%
      END IF;
      
      RETURN commission;
    END;
    $$;
    
    -- Use in SELECT statement
    SELECT
      salesperson,
      sales_amount,
      calculate_tiered_commission(sales_amount) AS commission
    FROM sales_data;

    Key advantages:

    • Called in SELECT statements (unlike stored procedures)
    • Complex business logic encapsulated
    • Reusable across queries
    • Better than stored procedures for inline calculations

    Real-World Example: Dynamic Pricing

    sql

    CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION calculate_dynamic_price(
      base_price FLOAT,
      inventory_level INT,
      demand_score FLOAT,
      competitor_price FLOAT
    )
    RETURNS FLOAT
    LANGUAGE SQL
    AS
    $$
    DECLARE
      adjusted_price FLOAT;
      inventory_factor FLOAT;
      demand_factor FLOAT;
    BEGIN
      -- Calculate inventory factor
      IF (inventory_level < 10) THEN
        inventory_factor := 1.15;  -- Low inventory: +15%
      ELSEIF (inventory_level > 100) THEN
        inventory_factor := 0.90;  -- High inventory: -10%
      ELSE
        inventory_factor := 1.0;
      END IF;
      
      -- Calculate demand factor
      IF (demand_score > 0.8) THEN
        demand_factor := 1.10;     -- High demand: +10%
      ELSEIF (demand_score < 0.3) THEN
        demand_factor := 0.95;     -- Low demand: -5%
      ELSE
        demand_factor := 1.0;
      END IF;
      
      -- Calculate adjusted price
      adjusted_price := base_price * inventory_factor * demand_factor;
      
      -- Price floor: Don't go below 80% of competitor
      IF (adjusted_price < competitor_price * 0.8) THEN
        adjusted_price := competitor_price * 0.8;
      END IF;
      
      -- Price ceiling: Don't exceed 120% of competitor
      IF (adjusted_price > competitor_price * 1.2) THEN
        adjusted_price := competitor_price * 1.2;
      END IF;
      
      RETURN ROUND(adjusted_price, 2);
    END;
    $$;
    
    -- Apply dynamic pricing across catalog
    SELECT
      product_id,
      product_name,
      base_price,
      calculate_dynamic_price(
        base_price,
        inventory_level,
        demand_score,
        competitor_price
      ) AS optimized_price
    FROM products;

    Lambda Expressions with Table Column References

    Snowflake 2025 enhances higher-order functions by allowing table column references in lambda expressions.

    Lambda expressions in Snowflake referencing both array elements and table columns

    What Are Higher-Order Functions?

    Higher-order functions operate on arrays using lambda functions:

    FILTER: Filter array elements MAP/TRANSFORM: Transform each element REDUCE: Aggregate array into single value

    New Capability: Column References

    Previously, lambda expressions couldn’t reference table columns:

    sql

    -- OLD: Limited to array elements only
    SELECT FILTER(
      price_array,
      x -> x > 100  -- Can only use array elements
    )
    FROM products;

    Now you can reference table columns:

    sql

    -- NEW: Reference table columns in lambda
    CREATE TABLE products (
      product_id INT,
      product_name VARCHAR,
      prices ARRAY,
      discount_threshold FLOAT
    );
    
    -- Use table column 'discount_threshold' in lambda
    SELECT
      product_id,
      product_name,
      FILTER(
        prices,
        p -> p > discount_threshold  -- References table column!
      ) AS prices_above_threshold
    FROM products;

    Real-World Use Case: Dynamic Filtering

    sql

    -- Inventory table with multiple warehouse locations
    CREATE TABLE inventory (
      product_id INT,
      warehouse_locations ARRAY,
      min_stock_level INT,
      stock_levels ARRAY
    );
    
    -- Filter warehouses where stock is below minimum
    SELECT
      product_id,
      FILTER(
        warehouse_locations,
        (loc, idx) -> stock_levels[idx] < min_stock_level
      ) AS understocked_warehouses,
      FILTER(
        stock_levels,
        level -> level < min_stock_level
      ) AS low_stock_amounts
    FROM inventory;

    Complex Example: Price Optimization

    sql

    -- Apply dynamic discounts based on product-specific rules
    CREATE TABLE product_pricing (
      product_id INT,
      base_prices ARRAY,
      competitor_prices ARRAY,
      max_discount_pct FLOAT,
      margin_threshold FLOAT
    );
    
    SELECT
      product_id,
      TRANSFORM(
        base_prices,
        (price, idx) -> 
          CASE
            -- Don't discount if already below competitor
            WHEN price <= competitor_prices[idx] * 0.95 THEN price
            -- Apply discount but respect margin threshold
            WHEN price * (1 - max_discount_pct / 100) >= margin_threshold 
              THEN price * (1 - max_discount_pct / 100)
            -- Use margin threshold as floor
            ELSE margin_threshold
          END
      ) AS optimized_prices
    FROM product_pricing;

    Additional SQL Improvements in 2025

    Beyond the major features, Snowflake 2025 includes numerous enhancements:

    Enhanced SEARCH Function Modes

    New search modes for more precise text matching:

    PHRASE Mode: Match exact phrases with token order

    sql

    SELECT *
    FROM documents
    WHERE SEARCH(content, 'data engineering best practices', 'PHRASE');

    AND Mode: All tokens must be present

    sql

    SELECT *
    FROM articles
    WHERE SEARCH(title, 'snowflake performance optimization', 'AND');

    OR Mode: Any token matches (existing, now explicit)

    sql

    SELECT *
    FROM blogs
    WHERE SEARCH(content, 'sql python scala', 'OR');

    Increased VARCHAR and BINARY Limits

    Maximum lengths significantly increased:

    • VARCHAR: Now 128 MB (previously 16 MB)
    • VARIANT, ARRAY, OBJECT: Now 128 MB
    • BINARY, GEOGRAPHY, GEOMETRY: Now 64 MB

    This enables:

    • Storing large JSON documents
    • Processing big text blobs
    • Handling complex geographic shapes

    Schema-Level Replication for Failover

    Selective replication for databases in failover groups:

    sql

    -- Replicate only specific schemas
    ALTER DATABASE production_db
    SET REPLICABLE_WITH_FAILOVER_GROUPS = TRUE;
    
    ALTER SCHEMA production_db.critical_schema
    SET REPLICABLE_WITH_FAILOVER_GROUPS = TRUE;
    
    -- Other schemas not replicated, reducing costs

    XML Format Support (General Availability)

    Native XML support for semi-structured data:

    sql

    -- Load XML files
    COPY INTO xml_data
    FROM @my_stage/data.xml
    FILE_FORMAT = (TYPE = 'XML');
    
    -- Query XML with familiar functions
    SELECT
      xml_data:customer:@id::STRING AS customer_id,
      xml_data:customer:name::STRING AS customer_name
    FROM xml_data;

    Best Practices for Snowflake SQL 2025

    This Snowflake SQL tutorial wouldn’t be complete without best practices…

    To maximize the benefits of these improvements:

    When to Use MERGE ALL BY NAME

    Use it when:

    • Tables have 5+ columns to map
    • Schemas evolve frequently
    • Column order varies across systems
    • Maintenance is a priority

    Avoid it when:

    • Fine control needed over specific columns
    • Conditional updates require different logic per column
    • Performance is absolutely critical (marginal difference)

    When to Use UNION BY NAME

    Use it when:

    • Combining data from multiple sources with varying schemas
    • Schema evolution happens regularly
    • Missing columns should be NULL-filled
    • Flexibility outweighs performance

    Avoid it when:

    • Schemas are identical and stable
    • Maximum performance is required
    • Large-scale production queries (billions of rows)

    Cortex AISQL Performance Tips

    Optimize AI function usage:

    • Filter data first before applying AI functions
    • Batch similar operations together
    • Use WHERE clauses to limit rows processed
    • Cache results when possible

    Example optimization:

    sql

    -- POOR: AI function on entire table
    SELECT AI_CLASSIFY(text, categories) FROM large_table;
    
    -- BETTER: Filter first, then classify
    SELECT AI_CLASSIFY(text, categories)
    FROM large_table
    WHERE date >= CURRENT_DATE - 7  -- Only recent data
    AND text IS NOT NULL
    AND LENGTH(text) > 50;  -- Only substantial text

    Snowflake Scripting UDF Guidelines

    Best practices:

    • Keep UDFs deterministic when possible
    • Test thoroughly with edge cases
    • Document complex logic with comments
    • Consider performance for frequently-called functions
    • Use instead of stored procedures when called in SELECT

    Migration Guide: Adopting 2025 Features

    For teams transitioning to these new features:

    Migration roadmap for adopting Snowflake SQL 2025 improvements in four phases

    Phase 1: Assess Current Code

    Identify candidates for improvement:

    sql

    -- Find MERGE statements that could use ALL BY NAME
    SELECT query_text
    FROM snowflake.account_usage.query_history
    WHERE query_text ILIKE '%MERGE INTO%'
    AND query_text ILIKE '%UPDATE SET%'
    AND query_text LIKE '%=%'  -- Has manual mapping
    AND start_time >= DATEADD(month, -3, CURRENT_TIMESTAMP());

    Phase 2: Test in Development

    Create test cases:

    1. Copy production MERGE to dev
    2. Rewrite using ALL BY NAME
    3. Compare results with original
    4. Benchmark performance differences
    5. Review with team

    Phase 3: Gradual Rollout

    Prioritize by impact:

    1. Start with non-critical pipelines
    2. Monitor for issues
    3. Expand to production incrementally
    4. Update documentation
    5. Train team on new syntax

    Phase 4: Standardize

    Update coding standards:

    • Prefer MERGE ALL BY NAME for new code
    • Refactor existing MERGE when touched
    • Document exceptions where old syntax preferred
    • Include in code reviews

    Troubleshooting Common Issues

    When adopting new features, watch for these issues:

    MERGE ALL BY NAME Not Working

    Problem: “Column count mismatch”

    Solution: Ensure exact column name matches:

    sql

    -- Check column names match
    SELECT column_name 
    FROM information_schema.columns 
    WHERE table_name = 'TARGET_TABLE'
    MINUS
    SELECT column_name 
    FROM information_schema.columns 
    WHERE table_name = 'SOURCE_TABLE';

    UNION BY NAME NULL Handling

    Problem: Unexpected NULLs in results

    Solution: Remember missing columns become NULL:

    sql

    -- Make NULLs explicit if needed
    SELECT
      COALESCE(column_name, 'DEFAULT_VALUE') AS column_name,
      ...
    FROM table1
    UNION ALL BY NAME
    SELECT * FROM table2;

    Cortex AISQL Performance

    Problem: AI functions running slowly

    Solution: Filter data before AI processing:

    sql

    -- Reduce data volume first
    WITH filtered AS (
      SELECT * FROM large_table
      WHERE conditions_to_reduce_rows
    )
    SELECT AI_CLASSIFY(text, categories)
    FROM filtered;

    Future SQL Improvements on Snowflake Roadmap

    Based on community feedback and Snowflake’s direction, expect these future enhancements:

    2026 Predicted Features:

    • More AI functions in Cortex AISQL
    • Enhanced MERGE with more flexible conditions
    • Additional higher-order functions
    • Improved query optimization for new syntax
    • Extended lambda capabilities

    Community Requests:

    • MERGE NOT MATCHED BY SOURCE (like SQL Server)
    • More flexible PIVOT syntax
    • Additional string manipulation functions
    • Graph query capabilities
    Snowflake SQL 2025 improvements overview showing all major features and enhancements

    Conclusion: Embracing Modern SQL in Snowflake

    This Snowflake SQL tutorial has covered the revolutionary 2025 improvements represent a significant leap forward in data engineering productivity. MERGE ALL BY NAME alone can save data engineers hours per week by eliminating tedious column mapping.

    The key benefits:

    • Less boilerplate code
    • Fewer errors from typos
    • Easier maintenance as schemas evolve
    • More time for valuable work

    For data engineers, these features mean spending less time fighting SQL syntax and more time solving business problems. The tools are more intelligent, the syntax more intuitive, and the results more reliable.

    Start today by identifying one MERGE statement you can simplify with ALL BY NAME. Experience the difference these modern SQL features make in your daily work.

    The future of SQL is here—and it’s dramatically simpler.


    Key Takeaways

    • MERGE ALL BY NAME automatically matches columns by name, eliminating manual mapping
    • Announced September 29, 2025, this feature reduces MERGE statements from 50+ lines to 5 lines
    • UNION BY NAME combines data from sources with different column orders and schemas
    • Cortex AISQL brings AI
  • Snowflake Optima: 15x Faster Queries at Zero Cost

    Snowflake Optima: 15x Faster Queries at Zero Cost

    Revolutionary Performance Without Lifting a Finger

    On October 8, 2025, Snowflake unveiled Snowflake Optima—a groundbreaking optimization engine that fundamentally changes how data warehouses handle performance. Unlike traditional optimization that requires manual tuning, configuration, and ongoing maintenance, Snowflake Optima analyzes your workload patterns in real-time and automatically implements optimizations that deliver dramatically faster queries.

    Here’s what makes this revolutionary:

    • 15x performance improvements in real-world customer workloads
    • Zero additional cost—no extra compute or storage charges
    • Zero configuration—no knobs to turn, no indexes to manage
    • Zero maintenance—continuous automatic optimization in the background

    For example, an automotive customer experienced queries dropping from 17.36 seconds to just 1.17 seconds after Snowflake Optima automatically kicked in. That’s a 15x acceleration without changing a single line of code or adjusting any settings.

    Moreover, this isn’t just about faster queries—it’s about effortless performance. Snowflake Optima represents a paradigm shift where speed is simply an outcome of using Snowflake, not a goal that requires constant engineering effort.


    What is Snowflake Optima?

    Snowflake Optima is an intelligent optimization engine built directly into the Snowflake platform that continuously analyzes SQL workload patterns and automatically implements the most effective performance strategies. Specifically, it eliminates the traditional burden of manual query tuning, index management, and performance monitoring.

    The Core Innovation of Optima:

    Traditionally, database optimization requires:

    • First, DBAs analyzing slow queries
    • Second, determining which indexes to create
    • Third, managing index storage and maintenance
    • Fourth, monitoring for performance degradation
    • Finally, repeating this cycle continuously

    With Optima, however, all of this happens automatically. Instead of requiring human intervention, Snowflake Optima:

    • Continuously monitors your workload patterns
    • Automatically identifies optimization opportunities
    • Intelligently creates hidden indexes when beneficial
    • Seamlessly maintains and updates optimizations
    • Transparently improves performance without user action

    Key Principles Behind Snowflake Optima

    Fundamentally, Snowflake Optima operates on three design principles:

    Performance First: Every query should run as fast as possible without requiring optimization expertise

    Simplicity Always: Zero configuration, zero maintenance, zero complexity

    Cost Efficiency: No additional charges for compute, storage, or the optimization service itself


    Snowflake Optima Indexing: The Breakthrough Feature

    At the heart of Snowflake Optima is Optima Indexing—an intelligent feature built on top of Snowflake’s Search Optimization Service. However, unlike traditional search optimization that requires manual configuration, Optima Indexing works completely automatically.

    How Snowflake Optima Indexing Works

    Specifically, Snowflake Optima Indexing continuously analyzes your SQL workloads to detect patterns and opportunities. When it identifies repetitive operations—such as frequent point-lookup queries on specific tables—it automatically generates hidden indexes designed to accelerate exactly those workload patterns.

    For instance:

    1. First, Optima monitors queries running on your Gen2 warehouses
    2. Then, it identifies recurring point-lookup queries with high selectivity
    3. Next, it analyzes whether an index would provide significant benefit
    4. Subsequently, it automatically creates a search index if worthwhile
    5. Finally, it maintains the index as data and workloads evolve

    Importantly, these indexes operate on a best-effort basis, meaning Snowflake manages them intelligently based on actual usage patterns and performance benefits. Unlike manually created indexes, they appear and disappear as workload patterns change, ensuring optimization remains relevant.

    Real-World Snowflake Optima Performance Gains

    Let’s examine actual customer results to understand Snowflake Optima’s impact:

    Snowflake Optima use cases across e-commerce, finance, manufacturing, and SaaS industries

    Case Study: Automotive Manufacturing Company

    Before Snowflake Optima:

    • Average query time: 17.36 seconds
    • Partition pruning rate: Only 30% of micro-partitions skipped
    • Warehouse efficiency: Moderate resource utilization
    • User experience: Slow dashboards, delayed analytics
    Before and after Snowflake Optima showing 15x query performance improvement

    After Snowflake Optima:

    • Average query time: 1.17 seconds (15x faster)
    • Partition pruning rate: 96% of micro-partitions skipped
    • Warehouse efficiency: Reduced resource contention
    • User experience: Lightning-fast dashboards, real-time insights

    Notably, the improvement wasn’t limited to the directly optimized queries. Because Snowflake Optima reduced resource contention on the warehouse, even queries that weren’t directly accelerated saw a 46% improvement in runtime—almost 2x faster.

    Furthermore, average job runtime on the entire warehouse improved from 2.63 seconds to 1.15 seconds—more than 2x faster overall.

    The Magic of Micro-Partition Pruning

    To understand Snowflake Optima’s power, you need to understand micro-partition pruning:

    Snowflake Optima micro-partition pruning improving from 30% to 96% efficiency

    Snowflake stores data in compressed micro-partitions (typically 50-500 MB). When you run a query, Snowflake first determines which micro-partitions contain relevant data through partition pruning.

    Without Snowflake Optima:

    • Snowflake uses table metadata (min/max values, distinct counts)
    • Typically prunes 30-50% of irrelevant partitions
    • Remaining partitions must still be scanned

    With Snowflake Optima:

    • Additionally uses hidden search indexes
    • Dramatically increases pruning rate to 90-96%
    • Significantly reduces data scanning requirements

    For example, in the automotive case study:

    • Total micro-partitions: 10,389
    • Pruned by metadata alone: 2,046 (20%)
    • Additional pruning by Snowflake Optima: 8,343 (80%)
    • Final pruning rate: 96%
    • Execution time: Dropped to just 636 milliseconds

    Snowflake Optima vs. Traditional Optimization

    Let’s compare Snowflake Optima against traditional database optimization approaches:

    Traditional manual optimization versus Snowflake Optima automatic optimization comparison

    Traditional Search Optimization Service

    Before Snowflake Optima, Snowflake offered the Search Optimization Service (SOS) that required manual configuration:

    Requirements:

    • DBAs must identify which tables benefit
    • Administrators must analyze query patterns
    • Teams must determine which columns to index
    • Organizations must weigh cost versus benefit manually
    • Users must monitor effectiveness continuously

    Challenges:

    • End users running queries aren’t responsible for costs
    • Query users don’t have knowledge to implement optimizations
    • Administrators aren’t familiar with every new workload
    • Teams lack time to analyze and optimize continuously

    Snowflake Optima: The Automatic Alternative

    With Snowflake Optima, however:

    Snowflake Optima delivers zero additional cost for automatic performance optimization

    Requirements:

    • Zero—it’s automatically enabled on Gen2 warehouses

    Configuration:

    • Zero—no settings, no knobs, no parameters

    Maintenance:

    • Zero—fully automatic in the background

    Cost Analysis:

    • Zero—no additional charges whatsoever

    Monitoring:

    • Optional—visibility provided but not required

    In other words, Snowflake Optima eliminates every burden associated with traditional optimization while delivering superior results.


    Technical Requirements for Snowflake Optima

    Currently, Snowflake Optima has specific technical requirements:

    Generation 2 Warehouses Only

    Snowflake Optima requires Generation 2 warehouses for automatic optimization

    Snowflake Optima is exclusively available on Snowflake Generation 2 (Gen2) standard warehouses. Therefore, ensure your infrastructure meets this requirement before expecting Optima benefits.

    To check your warehouse generation:

    sql

    SHOW WAREHOUSES;
    -- Look for TYPE column: STANDARD warehouses on Gen2

    If needed, migrate to Gen2 warehouses through Snowflake’s upgrade process.

    Best-Effort Optimization Model

    Unlike manually applied search optimization that guarantees index creation, Snowflake Optima operates on a best-effort basis:

    What this means:

    • Optima creates indexes when it determines they’re beneficial
    • Indexes may appear and disappear as workloads evolve
    • Optimization adapts to changing query patterns
    • Performance improves automatically but variably

    When to use manual search optimization instead:

    For specialized workloads requiring guaranteed performance—such as:

    • Cybersecurity threat detection (near-instantaneous response required)
    • Fraud prevention systems (consistent sub-second queries needed)
    • Real-time trading platforms (predictable latency essential)
    • Emergency response systems (reliability non-negotiable)

    In these cases, manually applying search optimization provides consistent index freshness and predictable performance characteristics.


    Monitoring Optima Performance

    Transparency is crucial for understanding optimization effectiveness. Fortunately, Snowflake provides comprehensive monitoring capabilities through the Query Profile tab in Snowsight.

    Snowflake Optima monitoring dashboard showing query performance insights and pruning statistics

    Query Insights Pane

    The Query Insights pane displays detected optimization insights for each query:

    What you’ll see:

    • Each type of insight detected for a query
    • Every instance of that insight type
    • Explicit notation when “Snowflake Optima used”
    • Details about which optimizations were applied

    To access:

    1. Navigate to Query History in Snowsight
    2. Select a query to examine
    3. Open the Query Profile tab
    4. Review the Query Insights pane

    When Snowflake Optima has optimized a query, you’ll see “Snowflake Optima used” clearly indicated with specifics about the optimization applied.

    Statistics Pane: Pruning Metrics

    The Statistics pane quantifies Snowflake Optima’s impact through partition pruning metrics:

    Key metric: “Partitions pruned by Snowflake Optima”

    What it shows:

    • Number of partitions skipped during query execution
    • Percentage of total partitions pruned
    • Improvement in data scanning efficiency
    • Direct correlation to performance gains

    For example:

    • Total partitions: 10,389
    • Pruned by Snowflake Optima: 8,343 (80%)
    • Total pruning rate: 96%
    • Result: 15x faster query execution

    This metric directly correlates to:

    • Faster query completion times
    • Reduced compute costs
    • Lower resource contention
    • Better overall warehouse efficiency

    Use Cases

    Let’s explore specific scenarios where Optima delivers exceptional value:

    Use Case 1: E-Commerce Analytics

    A large retail chain analyzes customer behavior across e-commerce and in-store platforms.

    Challenge:

    • Billions of rows across multiple tables
    • Frequent point-lookups on customer IDs
    • Filter-heavy queries on product SKUs
    • Time-sensitive queries on timestamps

    Before Optima:

    • Dashboard queries: 8-12 seconds average
    • Ad-hoc analysis: Extremely slow
    • User experience: Frustrated analysts
    • Business impact: Delayed decision-making

    With Snowflake Optima:

    • Dashboard queries: Under 1 second
    • Ad-hoc analysis: Lightning fast
    • User experience: Delighted analysts
    • Business impact: Real-time insights driving revenue

    Result: 10x performance improvement enabling real-time personalization and dynamic pricing strategies.

    Use Case 2: Financial Services Risk Analysis

    A global bank runs complex risk calculations across portfolio data.

    Challenge:

    • Massive datasets with billions of transactions
    • Regulatory requirements for rapid risk assessment
    • Recurring queries on account numbers and counterparties
    • Performance critical for compliance

    Before Snowflake Optima:

    • Risk calculations: 15-20 minutes
    • Compliance reporting: Hours to complete
    • Warehouse costs: High due to long-running queries
    • Regulatory risk: Potential delays

    With Snowflake Optima:

    • Risk calculations: 2-3 minutes
    • Compliance reporting: Real-time available
    • Warehouse costs: 40% reduction through efficiency
    • Regulatory risk: Eliminated through speed

    Result: 8x faster risk assessment ensuring regulatory compliance and enabling more sophisticated risk modeling.

    Use Case 3: IoT Sensor Data Analysis

    A manufacturing company analyzes sensor data from factory equipment.

    Challenge:

    • High-frequency sensor readings (millions per hour)
    • Point-lookups on specific machine IDs
    • Time-series queries for anomaly detection
    • Real-time requirements for predictive maintenance

    Before Snowflake Optima:

    • Anomaly detection: 30-45 seconds
    • Predictive models: Slow to train
    • Alert latency: Minutes behind real-time
    • Maintenance: Reactive not predictive

    With Snowflake Optima:

    • Anomaly detection: 2-3 seconds
    • Predictive models: Faster training cycles
    • Alert latency: Near real-time
    • Maintenance: Truly predictive

    Result: 12x performance improvement enabling proactive maintenance preventing $2M+ in equipment failures annually.

    Use Case 4: SaaS Application Backend

    A B2B SaaS platform powers customer-facing dashboards from Snowflake.

    Challenge:

    • Customer-specific queries with high selectivity
    • User-facing performance requirements (sub-second)
    • Variable workload patterns across customers
    • Cost efficiency critical for SaaS margins

    Before Snowflake Optima:

    • Dashboard load times: 5-8 seconds
    • User satisfaction: Low (performance complaints)
    • Warehouse scaling: Expensive to meet demand
    • Competitive position: Disadvantage

    With Snowflake Optima:

    • Dashboard load times: Under 1 second
    • User satisfaction: High (no complaints)
    • Warehouse scaling: Optimized automatically
    • Competitive position: Performance advantage

    Result: 7x performance improvement improving customer retention by 23% and reducing churn.


    Cost Implications of Snowflake Optima

    One of the most compelling aspects of Snowflake Optima is its cost structure: there isn’t one.

    Zero Additional Costs

    Snowflake Optima comes at no additional charge beyond your standard Snowflake costs:

    Zero Compute Costs:

    • Index creation: Free (uses Snowflake background serverless)
    • Index maintenance: Free (automatic background processes)
    • Query optimization: Free (integrated into query execution)

    Free Storage Allocation:

    • Index storage: Free (managed by Snowflake internally)
    • Overhead: Free (no impact on your storage bill)

    No Service Fees Applied:

    • Feature access: Free (included in Snowflake platform)
    • Monitoring: Free (built into Snowsight)

    In contrast, manually applied Search Optimization Service does incur costs:

    • Compute: For building and maintaining indexes
    • Storage: For the search access path structures
    • Ongoing: Continuous maintenance charges

    Therefore, Snowflake Optima delivers automatic performance improvements without expanding your budget or requiring cost-benefit analysis.

    Indirect Cost Savings

    Beyond zero direct costs, Snowflake Optima generates indirect savings:

    Reduced compute consumption:

    • Faster queries complete in less time
    • Fewer credits consumed per query
    • Better efficiency across all workloads

    Lower warehouse scaling needs:

    • Optimized queries reduce resource contention
    • Smaller warehouses can handle more load
    • Fewer multi-cluster warehouse scale-outs needed

    Decreased engineering overhead:

    • No DBA time spent on optimization
    • No analyst time troubleshooting slow queries
    • No DevOps time managing indexes

    Improved ROI:

    • Faster insights drive better decisions
    • Better performance improves user adoption
    • Lower costs increase profitability

    For example, the automotive customer saw:

    • 56% reduction in query execution time
    • 40% decrease in overall warehouse utilization
    • Estimated $50K annual savings on a single workload
    • Zero engineering hours invested in optimization

    Snowflake Optima Best Practices

    While Snowflake Optima requires zero configuration, following these best practices maximizes its effectiveness:

    Best Practice 1: Migrate to Gen2 Warehouses

    Ensure you’re running on Generation 2 warehouses:

    sql

    -- Check current warehouse generation
    SHOW WAREHOUSES;
    
    -- Contact Snowflake support to upgrade if needed

    Why this matters:

    • Snowflake Optima only works on Gen2 warehouses
    • Gen2 includes numerous other performance improvements
    • Migration is typically seamless with Snowflake support

    Best Practice 2: Monitor Optima Impact

    Regularly review Query Profile insights to understand Snowflake Optima’s impact:

    Steps:

    1. Navigate to Query History in Snowsight
    2. Filter for your most important queries
    3. Check Query Insights pane for “Snowflake Optima used”
    4. Review partition pruning statistics
    5. Document performance improvements

    Why this matters:

    • Visibility into automatic optimizations
    • Evidence of value for stakeholders
    • Understanding of workload patterns

    Best Practice 3: Complement with Manual Optimization for Critical Workloads

    For mission-critical queries requiring guaranteed performance:

    sql

    -- Apply manual search optimization
    ALTER TABLE critical_table ADD SEARCH OPTIMIZATION 
    ON (customer_id, transaction_date);

    When to use:

    • Cybersecurity threat detection
    • Fraud prevention systems
    • Real-time trading platforms
    • Emergency response systems

    Why this matters:

    • Guaranteed index freshness
    • Predictable performance characteristics
    • Consistent sub-second response times

    Best Practice 4: Maintain Query Quality

    Even with Snowflake Optima, write efficient queries:

    Good practices:

    • Selective filters (WHERE clauses that filter significantly)
    • Appropriate data types (exact matches vs. wildcards)
    • Proper joins (avoid unnecessary cross joins)
    • Result limiting (use LIMIT when appropriate)

    Why this matters:

    • Snowflake Optima amplifies good query design
    • Poor queries may not benefit from optimization
    • Best results come from combining both

    Best Practice 5: Understand Workload Characteristics

    Know which query patterns benefit most from Snowflake Optima:

    Optimal for:

    • Point-lookup queries (WHERE id = ‘specific_value’)
    • Highly selective filters (returns small percentage of rows)
    • Recurring patterns (same query structure repeatedly)
    • Large tables (billions of rows)

    Less optimal for:

    • Full table scans (no WHERE clauses)
    • Low selectivity (returns most rows)
    • One-off queries (never repeated)
    • Small tables (already fast)

    Why this matters:

    • Realistic expectations for performance gains
    • Better understanding of when Optima helps
    • Strategic planning for workload design

    Snowflake Optima and the Future of Performance

    Snowflake Optima represents more than just a technical feature—it’s a strategic vision for the future of data warehouse performance.

    The Philosophy Behind Snowflake Optima

    Traditionally, database performance required trade-offs:

    • Performance OR simplicity (fast databases were complex)
    • Automation OR control (automatic features lacked flexibility)
    • Cost OR speed (faster performance cost more money)

    Snowflake Optima eliminates these trade-offs:

    • Performance AND simplicity (fast without complexity)
    • Automation AND intelligence (smart automatic decisions)
    • Cost efficiency AND speed (faster at no extra cost)

    The Virtuous Cycle of Intelligence

    Snowflake Optima creates a self-improving system:

    Snowflake Optima continuous learning cycle for automatic performance improvement
    1. Optima monitors workload patterns continuously
    2. Patterns inform optimization decisions intelligently
    3. Optimizations improve performance automatically
    4. Performance enables more complex workloads
    5. New workloads provide more data for learning
    6. Cycle repeats, continuously improving

    This means your data warehouse becomes smarter over time, learning from usage patterns and continuously improving without human intervention.

    What’s Next for Snowflake Optima

    Based on Snowflake’s roadmap and industry trends, expect these future developments:

    Short-term (2025-2026):

    • Expanded query types benefiting from Snowflake Optima
    • Additional optimization strategies beyond indexing
    • Enhanced monitoring and explainability features
    • Support for additional warehouse configurations

    Medium-term (2026-2027):

    • Cross-query optimization (learning from related queries)
    • Workload-specific optimization profiles
    • Predictive optimization (anticipating future needs)
    • Integration with other Snowflake intelligent features
    Future vision of Snowflake Optima evolving into AI-powered autonomous optimization

    Long-term (2027+):

    • AI-powered optimization using machine learning
    • Autonomous database management capabilities
    • Self-healing performance issues automatically
    • Cognitive optimization understanding business context

    Getting Started with Snowflake Optima

    The beauty of Snowflake Optima is that getting started requires virtually no effort:

    Step 1: Verify Gen2 Warehouses

    Check if you’re running Generation 2 warehouses:

    sql

    SHOW WAREHOUSES;

    Look for:

    • TYPE column: Should show STANDARD
    • Generation: Contact Snowflake if unsure

    If needed:

    • Contact Snowflake support for Gen2 upgrade
    • Migration is typically seamless and fast

    Step 2: Run Your Normal Workloads

    Simply continue running your existing queries:

    No configuration needed:

    • Snowflake Optima monitors automatically
    • Optimizations apply in the background
    • Performance improves without intervention

    No changes required:

    • Keep existing query patterns
    • Maintain current warehouse configurations
    • Continue normal operations

    Step 3: Monitor the Impact

    After a few days or weeks, review the results:

    In Snowsight:

    1. Go to Query History
    2. Select queries to examine
    3. Open Query Profile tab
    4. Look for “Snowflake Optima used”
    5. Review partition pruning statistics

    Key metrics:

    • Query duration improvements
    • Partition pruning percentages
    • Warehouse efficiency gains

    Step 4: Share the Success

    Document and communicate Snowflake Optima benefits:

    For stakeholders:

    • Performance improvements (X times faster)
    • Cost savings (reduced compute consumption)
    • User satisfaction (faster dashboards, better experience)

    For technical teams:

    • Pruning statistics (data scanning reduction)
    • Workload patterns (which queries optimized)
    • Best practices (maximizing Optima effectiveness)

    Snowflake Optima FAQs

    What is Snowflake Optima?

    Snowflake Optima is an intelligent optimization engine that automatically analyzes SQL workload patterns and implements performance optimizations without requiring configuration or maintenance. It delivers dramatically faster queries at zero additional cost.

    How much does Snowflake Optima cost?

    Zero. Snowflake Optima comes at no additional charge beyond your standard Snowflake costs. There are no compute charges, storage charges, or service charges for using Snowflake Optima.

    What are the requirements for Snowflake Optima?

    Snowflake Optima requires Generation 2 (Gen2) standard warehouses. It’s automatically enabled on qualifying warehouses without any configuration needed.

    How does Snowflake Optima compare to manual Search Optimization Service?

    Snowflake Optima operates automatically without configuration and at zero cost, while manual Search Optimization Service requires configuration and incurs compute and storage charges. For most workloads, Snowflake Optima is the better choice. However, mission-critical workloads requiring guaranteed performance may still benefit from manual optimization.

    How do I monitor Snowflake Optima performance?

    Use the Query Profile tab in Snowsight to monitor Snowflake Optima. The Query Insights pane shows when Snowflake Optima was used, and the Statistics pane displays partition pruning metrics showing performance impact.

    Can I disable Snowflake Optima?

    No, Snowflake Optima cannot be disabled on Gen2 warehouses. However, it operates on a best-effort basis and only creates optimizations when beneficial, so there’s no downside to having it active.

    What types of queries benefit from Snowflake Optima?

    Snowflake Optima is most effective for point-lookup queries with highly selective filters on large tables, especially recurring query patterns. Queries returning small percentages of rows see the biggest improvements.


    Conclusion: The Dawn of Effortless Performance

    Snowflake Optima marks a fundamental shift in how organizations approach database performance. For decades, achieving fast query performance required dedicated DBAs, constant tuning, and careful optimization. With Snowflake Optima, however, speed is simply an outcome of using Snowflake.

    The results speak for themselves:

    • 15x performance improvements in real-world workloads
    • Zero additional cost or configuration required
    • Zero maintenance burden on teams
    • Continuous improvement as workloads evolve

    More importantly, Snowflake Optima represents a strategic advantage for organizations managing complex data operations. By removing the burden of manual optimization, your team can focus on deriving insights rather than tuning infrastructure.

    The self-adapting nature of Snowflake Optima means your data warehouse becomes smarter over time, learning from usage patterns and continuously improving without human intervention. This creates a virtuous cycle where performance naturally improves as your workloads evolve and grow.

    Snowflake Optima streamlines optimization for data engineers, saving countless hours. Analysts benefit from accelerated insights and smoother user experiences. Meanwhile, executives see improved ROI — all without added investment.

    The future of database performance isn’t about smarter DBAs or better optimization tools—it’s about intelligent systems that optimize themselves. Optima is that future, available today.

    Are you ready to experience effortless performance?


    Key Takeaways

    • Snowflake Optima delivers automatic query optimization without configuration or cost
    • Announced October 8, 2025, currently available on Gen2 standard warehouses
    • Real customers achieve 15x performance improvements automatically
    • Optima Indexing continuously monitors workloads and creates hidden indexes intelligently
    • Zero additional charges for compute, storage, or the optimization service
    • Partition pruning improvements from 30% to 96% drive dramatic speed increases
    • Best-effort optimization adapts to changing workload patterns automatically
    • Monitoring available through Query Profile tab in Snowsight
    • Mission-critical workloads can still use manual search optimization for guaranteed performance
    • Future roadmap includes AI-powered optimization and autonomous database management
  • Open Semantic Interchange: Solving AI’s $1T Problem

    Open Semantic Interchange: Solving AI’s $1T Problem

    Breaking: Tech Giants Unite to Solve AI’s Biggest Bottleneck

    The Open Semantic Interchange was announced by Snowflake in their official blog On September 23, 2025, something unprecedented happened in the data industry. Open Semantic Interchange (OSI), a groundbreaking initiative led by Snowflake, Salesforce, BlackRock, and dbt Labs, was announced to solve AI’s biggest problem. These 15+ technology companies would give away their data secrets—collaboratively creating the Open Semantic Interchange as an open, vendor-neutral standard for how business data is defined across all platforms.

    This isn’t just another tech announcement. It’s the industry admitting that the emperor has no clothes.

    For decades, every software vendor has defined business metrics differently. Your data warehouse calls it “revenue.” Your BI tool calls it “total sales.” Your CRM calls it “booking amount.” Your AI model? It has no idea they’re the same thing.

    This semantic chaos has created what VentureBeat calls the $1 trillion AI problem—the massive hidden cost of data preparation, reconciliation, and the manual labor required before any AI project can begin.

    Enter the Open Semantic Interchang (OSI)—a groundbreaking initiative that could become as fundamental to AI as SQL was to databases or HTTP was to the web.


    What is Open Semantic Interchange (OSI)? Understanding the Semantic Standard

    Open Semantic Interchange is an open-source initiative that creates a universal, vendor-neutral specification for defining and sharing semantic metadata across data platforms, BI tools, and AI applications.

    The Simple Explanation of Open Semantic Interchange

    Think of OSI as a Rosetta Stone for business data. Just as the ancient Rosetta Stone allowed scholars to translate between Egyptian hieroglyphics, Greek, and Demotic script, OSI allows different software systems to understand each other’s data definitions.

    When your data warehouse, BI dashboard, and AI model all speak the same semantic language, magic happens:

    • No more weeks reconciling conflicting definitions
    • No more “which revenue number is correct?”
    • No more AI models trained on misunderstood data
    • No more rebuilding logic across every tool
    Hand-drawn flow showing single semantic definition distributed consistently to all platforms

    Open Semantic Interchange Technical Definition

    OSI provides a standardized specification for semantic models that includes:

    Business Metrics: Calculations, aggregations, and KPIs (revenue, customer lifetime value, churn rate)

    Dimensions: Attributes for slicing data (time, geography, product category)

    Hierarchies: Relationships between data elements (country → state → city)

    Business Rules: Logic and constraints governing data interpretation

    Context & Metadata: Descriptions, ownership, lineage, and governance policies

    Built on familiar formats like YAML and compatible with RDF and OWL, this specification stands out by being tailored specifically for modern analytics and AI workloads.


    The $1 Trillion Problem: Why Open Semantic Interchange Matters Now

    The Hidden Tax: Why Semantic Interchange is Critical for AI Projects

    Every AI initiative begins the same way. Data scientists don’t start building models—they start reconciling data.

    Week 1-2: “Wait, why are there three different revenue numbers?”

    Week 3-4: “Which customer definition should we use?”

    Week 5-6: “These date fields don’t match across systems.”

    Week 7-8: “We need to rebuild this logic because BI and ML define margins differently.”

    Data fragmentation problem that Open Semantic Interchange solves across platforms

    According to industry research, data preparation consumes 60-80% of data science time. For enterprises spending millions on AI, this represents a staggering hidden cost.

    Real-World Horror Stories Without Semantic Interchange

    Fortune 500 Retailer: Spent 9 months building a customer lifetime value model. When deployment came, marketing and finance disagreed on the “customer” definition. Project scrapped.

    Global Bank: Built fraud detection across 12 regions. Each region’s “transaction” definition differed. Model accuracy varied 35% between regions due to semantic inconsistency.

    Healthcare System: Created patient risk models using EHR data. Clinical teams rejected the model because “readmission” calculations didn’t match their operational definitions.

    These aren’t edge cases—they’re the norm. The lack of semantic standards is silently killing AI ROI across every industry.

    Why Open Semantic Interchange Now? The AI Inflection Point

    Generative AI has accelerated the crisis. When you ask ChatGPT or Claude to “analyze Q3 revenue by region,” the AI needs to understand:

    • What “revenue” means in your business
    • How “regions” are defined
    • Which “Q3” you’re referring to
    • What calculations to apply

    Without semantic standards, AI agents give inconsistent, untrustworthy answers. As enterprises move from AI pilots to production at scale, semantic fragmentation has become the primary blocker to AI adoption.


    The Founding Coalition: Who’s Behind OSI

    OSI isn’t a single-vendor initiative—rather it’s an unprecedented collaboration across the data ecosystem.

    Coalition of 17 companies collaborating on Open Semantic Interchange standard

    Companies Leading the Open Semantic Interchange Initiative

    Snowflake: The AI Data Cloud company spearheading the initiative, contributing engineering resources and governance infrastructure

    Salesforce (Tableau): Co-leading with Snowflake, bringing BI perspective and Tableau’s semantic layer expertise

    dbt Labs: Furthermore,contributing the dbt Semantic Layer framework as a foundational technology

    BlackRock:Moreover, representing financial services with the Aladdin platform, ensuring real-world enterprise requirements

    RelationalAI:Finally, bringing knowledge graph and reasoning capabilities for complex semantic relationships

    Launch Partners (17 Total)

    BI & Analytics: ThoughtSpot, Sigma, Hex, Omni

    Data Governance: Alation, Atlan, Select Star

    AI & ML: Mistral AI, Elementum AI

    Industry Solutions: Blue Yonder, Honeydew, Cube

    This coalition represents competitors agreeing to open-source their competitive advantage for the greater good of the industry.

    Why Competitors Are Collaborating on Semantic Interchange

    As Christian Kleinerman, EVP Product at Snowflake, explains: “The biggest barrier our customers face when it comes to ROI from AI isn’t a competitor—it’s data fragmentation.”

    Indeed, this observation highlights a critical industry truth. Rather than competing against other vendors, organizations are actually fighting against their own internal data inconsistencies. Moreover, this fragmentation costs enterprises millions annually in lost productivity and delayed AI initiatives.

    Similarly, Southard Jones, CPO at Tableau, emphasizes the collaborative nature: “This initiative is transformative because it’s not about one company owning the standard—it’s about the industry coming together.”

    In other words, the traditional competitive dynamics are being reimagined. Instead of proprietary lock-in strategies, therefore, the industry is choosing open collaboration. Consequently, this shift benefits everyone—vendors, enterprises, and end users alike.

    Ryan Segar, CPO at dbt Labs: “Data and analytics engineers will now be able to work with the confidence that their work will be leverageable across the data ecosystem.”

    The message is clear: Standardization isn’t a commoditizer—it’s a catalyst. Like USB-C didn’t hurt device makers, OSI won’t hurt data platforms. It shifts competition from data definitions to innovation in user experience and AI capabilities.


    How Open Semantic Interchange (OSI) Works: Technical Deep Dive

    The Open Semantic Interchange Specification Structure

    OSI defines semantic models in a structured, machine-readable format. Here’s what a simplified OSI specification looks like:

    Metrics Definition:

    • Name, description, and business owner
    • Calculation formula with explicit dependencies
    • Aggregation rules (sum, average, count distinct)
    • Filters and conditions
    • Temporal considerations (point-in-time vs. accumulated)

    Dimension Definition:

    • Attribute names and data types
    • Valid values and constraints
    • Hierarchical relationships
    • Display formatting rules

    Relationships:

    • How metrics relate to dimensions
    • Join logic and cardinality
    • Foreign key relationships
    • Temporal alignment

    Governance Metadata:

    • Data lineage and source systems
    • Ownership and stewardship
    • Access policies and sensitivity
    • Certification status and quality scores
    • Version history and change logs
    Open Semantic Interchange architecture showing semantic layer connecting data to applications

    Open Semantic Interchange Technology Stack

    Format: YAML (human-readable, version-control friendly)

    Compilation: Engines that translate OSI specs into platform-specific code (SQL, Python, APIs)

    Transport: REST APIs and file-based exchange

    Validation: Schema validation and semantic correctness checking

    Extension: Plugin architecture for domain-specific semantics

    Integration Patterns

    Organizations can adopt OSI through multiple approaches:

    Native Integration: Platforms like Snowflake directly support OSI specifications

    Translation Layer: Tools convert between proprietary formats and OSI

    Dual-Write: Systems maintain both proprietary and OSI formats

    Federation: Central OSI registry with distributed consumption


    Real-World Use Cases: Open Semantic Interchange in Action

    Hand-drawn journey map showing analyst problem solved through OSI implementation

    Use Case 1: Open Semantic Interchange for Multi-Cloud Analytics

    Challenge: A global retailer runs analytics on Snowflake but visualizations in Tableau, with data science in Databricks. Each platform defined “sales” differently.

    Before OSI:

    • Data team spent 40 hours/month reconciling definitions
    • Business users saw conflicting dashboards
    • ML models trained on inconsistent logic
    • Trust in analytics eroded
    Hand-drawn before and after comparison showing data chaos versus OSI harmony

    With OSI:

    • Single OSI specification defines “sales” once
    • All platforms consume the same semantic model
    • Dashboards, notebooks, and AI agents align
    • Data team focuses on new insights, not reconciliation

    Impact: 90% reduction in semantic reconciliation time, 35% increase in analytics trust scores

    Use Case 2: Semantic Interchange for M&A Integration

    Challenge: A financial services company acquired three competitors, each with distinct data definitions for “customer,” “account,” and “portfolio value.”

    Before OSI:

    • 18-month integration timeline
    • $12M spent on data mapping consultants
    • Incomplete semantic alignment at launch
    • Ongoing reconciliation needed

    With OSI:

    • Each company publishes OSI specifications
    • Automated mapping identifies overlaps and conflicts
    • Human review focuses only on genuine business rule differences
    • Integration completed in 6 months

    Impact: 67% faster integration, 75% lower consulting costs, complete semantic alignment

    Use Case 3: Open Semantic Interchange Improves AI Agent Trust

    Challenge: An insurance company deployed AI agents for claims processing. Agents gave inconsistent answers because “claim amount,” “deductible,” and “coverage” had multiple definitions.

    Before OSI:

    • Customer service agents stopped using AI tools
    • 45% of AI answers flagged as incorrect
    • Manual verification required for all AI outputs
    • AI initiative considered a failure

    With OSI:

    • All insurance concepts defined in OSI specification
    • AI agents query consistent semantic layer
    • Answers align with operational systems
    • Audit trails show which definitions were used

    Impact: 92% accuracy rate, 70% reduction in manual verification, AI adoption rate increased to 85%

    Use Case 4: Semantic Interchange for Regulatory Compliance

    Challenge: A bank needed consistent risk reporting across Basel III, IFRS 9, and CECL requirements. Each framework defined “exposure,” “risk-weighted assets,” and “provisions” slightly differently.

    Before OSI:

    • Separate data pipelines for each framework
    • Manual reconciliation of differences
    • Audit findings on inconsistent definitions
    • High cost of compliance

    With OSI:

    • Regulatory definitions captured in domain-specific OSI extensions
    • Single data pipeline with multiple semantic views
    • Automated reconciliation and variance reporting
    • Full audit trail of definition changes

    Impact: 60% lower compliance reporting costs, zero audit findings, 80% faster regulatory change implementation


    Industry Impact by Vertical

    Hand-drawn grid showing OSI impact across finance, healthcare, retail, and manufacturing

    Financial Services

    Primary Benefit: Regulatory compliance and cross-platform consistency

    Key Use Cases:

    • Risk reporting across frameworks (Basel, IFRS, CECL)
    • Trading analytics with market data integration
    • Customer 360 across wealth, retail, and commercial banking
    • Fraud detection with consistent entity definitions

    Early Adopter: BlackRock’s Aladdin platform, which already unifies investment management with common data language

    Healthcare & Life Sciences

    Primary Benefit: Clinical and operational data alignment

    Key Use Cases:

    • Patient outcomes research across EHR systems
    • Claims analytics with consistent diagnosis coding
    • Drug safety surveillance with adverse event definitions
    • Population health with social determinants integration

    Impact: Enables federated analytics while respecting patient privacy

    Retail & E-Commerce

    Primary Benefit: Omnichannel consistency and supply chain alignment

    Key Use Cases:

    • Customer lifetime value across channels (online, mobile, in-store)
    • Inventory optimization with consistent product hierarchies
    • Marketing attribution with unified conversion definitions
    • Supply chain analytics with vendor data integration

    Impact: True omnichannel understanding of customer behavior

    Manufacturing

    Primary Benefit: OT/IT convergence and supply chain interoperability

    Key Use Cases:

    • Predictive maintenance with consistent failure definitions
    • Quality analytics across plants and suppliers
    • Supply chain visibility with partner data
    • Energy consumption with sustainability metrics

    Impact: End-to-end visibility from raw materials to customer delivery


    Open Semantic Interchange Implementation Roadmap

    Hand-drawn roadmap showing OSI growth from 2025 seedling to 2028 mature ecosystem

    Phase 1: Foundation (Q4 2025 – Q1 2026)

    Goals:

    • Publish initial OSI specification v1.0
    • Release reference implementations
    • Launch community forum and GitHub repository
    • Establish governance structure

    Deliverables:

    • Core specification for metrics, dimensions, relationships
    • YAML schema and validation tools
    • Sample semantic models for common use cases
    • Developer documentation and tutorials

    Phase 2: Ecosystem Adoption (Q2-Q4 2026)

    Goals:

    • Native support in major data platforms
    • Translation tools for legacy systems
    • Domain-specific extensions (finance, healthcare, retail)
    • Growing library of shared semantic models

    Milestones:

    • 50+ platforms supporting OSI
    • 100+ published semantic models
    • Enterprise adoption case studies
    • Certification program for OSI compliance

    Phase 3: Industry Standard (2027+)

    Goals:

    • Recognition as de facto standard
    • International standards body adoption
    • Regulatory recognition in key industries
    • Continuous evolution through community

    Vision:

    • OSI as fundamental as SQL for databases
    • Semantic models as reusable as open-source libraries
    • Cross-industry semantic model marketplace
    • AI agents natively understanding OSI specifications

    Open Semantic Interchange Benefits for Different Stakeholders

    Data Engineers

    Before OSI:

    • Rebuild semantic logic for each new tool
    • Debug definition mismatches
    • Manual data reconciliation pipelines

    With OSI:

    • Define business logic once
    • Automatic propagation to all tools
    • Focus on data quality, not definition mapping

    Time Savings: 40-60% reduction in pipeline development time

    Data Analysts

    Before OSI:

    • Verify metric definitions before trusting reports
    • Recreate calculations in each BI tool
    • Reconcile conflicting dashboards

    With OSI:

    • Trust that all tools use same definitions
    • Self-service analytics with confidence
    • Focus on insights, not validation

    Productivity Gain: 3x increase in analysis output

    Open Semantic Interchange Benefits for Data Scientists

    Before OSI:

    • Spend weeks understanding data semantics
    • Build custom feature engineering for each project
    • Models fail in production due to definition drift

    With OSI:

    • Leverage pre-defined semantic features
    • Reuse feature engineering logic
    • Production models aligned with business systems

    Impact: 5-10x faster model development

    How Semantic Interchange Empowers Business Users

    Before OSI:

    • Receive conflicting reports from different teams
    • Unsure which numbers to trust
    • Can’t ask AI agents confidently

    With OSI:

    • Consistent numbers across all reports
    • Trust AI-generated insights
    • Self-service analytics without IT

    Trust Increase: 50-70% higher confidence in data-driven decisions

    Open Semantic Interchange Value for IT Leadership

    Before OSI:

    • Vendor lock-in through proprietary semantics
    • High cost of platform switching
    • Difficult to evaluate best-of-breed tools

    With OSI:

    • Freedom to choose best tools for each use case
    • Lower switching costs and negotiating leverage
    • Faster time-to-value for new platforms

    Strategic Flexibility: 60% reduction in platform lock-in risk


    Challenges and Considerations

    Challenge 1: Organizational Change for Semantic Interchange

    Issue: OSI requires organizations to agree on single source of truth definitions—politically challenging when different departments define metrics differently.

    Solution:

    • Start with uncontroversial definitions
    • Use OSI to make conflicts visible and force resolution
    • Establish data governance councils
    • Frame as risk reduction, not turf battle

    Challenge 2: Integrating Legacy Systems with Semantic Interchange

    Issue: Older systems may lack APIs or semantic metadata capabilities.

    Solution:

    • Build translation layers
    • Gradually migrate legacy definitions to OSI
    • Focus on high-value use cases first
    • Use OSI for new systems, translate for old

    Challenge 3: Specification Evolution

    Issue: Business definitions change—how does OSI handle versioning and migration?

    Solution:

    • Built-in versioning in OSI specification
    • Deprecation policies and timelines
    • Automated impact analysis tools
    • Backward compatibility guidelines

    Challenge 4: Domain-Specific Complexity

    Issue: Some industries have extremely complex semantic models (e.g., derivatives trading, clinical research).

    Solution:

    • Domain-specific OSI extensions
    • Industry working groups
    • Pluggable architecture for specialized needs
    • Start simple, expand complexity gradually

    Challenge 5: Governance and Ownership

    Issue: Who owns the semantic definitions? Who can change them?

    Solution:

    • Clear ownership model in OSI metadata
    • Approval workflows for definition changes
    • Audit trails and change logs
    • Role-based access control

    How Open Semantic Interchange Shifts the Competitive Landscape

    Before OSI: The Walled Garden Era

    Vendors competed by locking in data semantics. Moving from Platform A to Platform B meant rebuilding all your business logic.

    This created:

    • High switching costs
    • Vendor power imbalance
    • Slow innovation (vendors focused on lock-in, not features)
    • Customer resentment

    After OSI: The Innovation Era

    With semantic portability, vendors must compete on:

    • User experience and interface design
    • AI capabilities and intelligence
    • Performance and scalability
    • Integration breadth and ease
    • Support and services

    Southard Jones (Tableau): “Standardization isn’t a commoditizer—it’s a catalyst. Think of it like a standard electrical outlet: the outlet itself isn’t the innovation, it’s what you plug into it.”

    This shift benefits customers through:

    • Better products (vendors focus on innovation)
    • Lower costs (competition increases)
    • Flexibility (easy to switch or multi-source)
    • Faster AI adoption (semantic consistency enables trust)

    How to Get Started with Open Semantic Interchange (OSI)

    For Enterprises

    Step 1: Assess Current State (1-2 weeks)

    • Inventory your data platforms and BI tools
    • Document how metrics are currently defined
    • Identify semantic conflicts and pain points
    • Estimate time spent on definition reconciliation

    Step 2: Pilot Use Case (1-2 months)

    • Choose a high-impact but manageable scope (e.g., revenue metrics)
    • Define OSI specification for selected metrics
    • Implement in 2-3 key tools
    • Measure impact on reconciliation time and trust

    Step 3: Expand Gradually (6-12 months)

    • Add more metrics and dimensions
    • Integrate additional platforms
    • Establish governance processes
    • Train teams on OSI practices

    Step 4: Operationalize (Ongoing)

    • Make Open semantic interchange part of standard data modeling
    • Integrate into data governance framework
    • Participate in community to influence roadmap
    • Share learnings and semantic models

    For Technology Vendors

    Kickoff Phase: Evaluate Strategic Fit (Immediate)

    • Review Open semantic interchange specification
    • Assess compatibility with your platform
    • Identify required engineering work
    • Estimate go-to-market impact

    Next : Join the Initiative (Q4 2025)

    • Become an Open semantic interchange partner
    • Participate in working groups
    • Contribute to specification development
    • Collaborate on reference implementations

    Strenghthen the core: Implement Support (2026)

    • Add OSI import/export capabilities
    • Provide migration tools from proprietary formats
    • Update documentation and training
    • Certify OSI compliance

    Finally: Differentiate (Ongoing)

    • Build value-added services on top of OSI
    • Focus innovation on user experience
    • Lead with interoperability messaging
    • Partner with ecosystem for joint solutions

    The Future: What’s Next for Open Semantic Interchange

    2025-2026: Specification & Early Adoption

    • Initial specification published (Q4 2025)
    • Reference implementations released
    • Major vendors announce support
    • First enterprise pilot programs
    • Community formation and governance

    2027-2028: Mainstream Adoption

    • OSI becomes default for new projects
    • Translation tools for legacy systems mature
    • Domain-specific extensions proliferate
    • Marketplace for shared semantic models emerges
    • Analyst recognition as emerging standard

    2029-2030: Industry Standard Status

    • International standards body adoption
    • Regulatory recognition in financial services
    • Built into enterprise procurement requirements
    • University curricula include Open semantic interchange
    • Semantic models as common as APIs

    Long-Term Vision

    The Semantic Web Realized: Open semantic interchange could finally deliver on the promise of the Semantic Web—not through abstract ontologies, but through practical, business-focused semantic standards.

    AI Agent Economy: When AI agents understand semantics consistently, they can collaborate across organizational boundaries, creating a true agentic AI ecosystem.

    Hand-drawn future vision of collaborative AI agent ecosystem powered by OSI

    Data Product Marketplace: Open semantic interchange enables data products with embedded semantics, making them immediately usable without integration work.

    Cross-Industry Innovation: Semantic models from one industry (e.g., supply chain optimization) could be adapted to others (e.g., healthcare logistics) through shared Open semantic interchange definitions.


    Conclusion: The Rosetta Stone Moment for AI

    Conclusion: The Rosetta Stone Moment for AI

    The launch of Open Semantic Interchange marks a watershed moment in the data industry. For the first time, fierce competitors have set aside proprietary advantages to solve a problem that affects everyone: semantic fragmentation.

    However, this isn’t just about technical standards—rather, it’s about unlocking a trillion dollars in trapped AI value.

    Specifically, when every platform speaks the same semantic language, AI can finally deliver on its promise:

    • First, trustworthy insights that business users believe
    • Second, fast time-to-value without months of data prep
    • Third, flexible tool choices without vendor lock-in
    • Finally, scalable AI adoption across the enterprise

    Importantly, the biggest winners will be organizations that adopt early. While others struggle with semantic reconciliation, early adopters will be deploying AI agents, building sophisticated analytics, and making data-driven decisions with confidence.

    Ultimately, the question isn’t whether Open Semantic Interchange will become the standard—instead, it’s how quickly you’ll adopt it to stay competitive.

    The revolution has begun. Indeed, the Rosetta Stone for business data is here.

    So, are you ready to speak the universal language of AI?


    Key Takeaways

  • Synapse to Fabric: Your ADX Migration Guide 2025

    Synapse to Fabric: Your ADX Migration Guide 2025

    The clock is ticking for Azure Synapse Data Explorer (ADX). With its retirement announced, a strategic Synapse to Fabric migration is now a critical task for data teams. This move to Microsoft Fabric’s Real-Time Analytics and its Eventhouse database unlocks a unified, AI-powered experience, and this guide will show you how.

    This guide will walk you through the entire process, from planning to execution, complete with practical examples and KQL code snippets to ensure a smooth transition.

    Why This is Happening: The Drive Behind the Synapse to Fabric Migration

    Microsoft’s vision is clear: a single, integrated platform for all data and analytics workloads. This Synapse to Fabric migration is a direct result of that vision. While powerful, Azure Synapse Analytics was built from a collection of distinct services. Microsoft Fabric breaks down these silos, offering a unified SaaS experience where data engineering, data science, and business intelligence coexist seamlessly.

    A 'before and after' architecture diagram comparing the separate services of Azure Data Explorer with the integrated Microsoft Fabric Eventhouse solution for real-time analytics.

    Eventhouse is the next evolution of the Kusto engine that powered ADX, now deeply integrated within the Fabric ecosystem. It’s built for high-performance querying on streaming, semi-structured data—making it the natural successor for your ADX workloads.

    Key Benefits of Migrating to Fabric Eventhouse:

    • OneLake Integration: Your data lives in OneLake, a single, tenant-wide data lake, eliminating data duplication and movement.
    • Unified Experience: Switch from data ingestion to query to Power BI reporting within a single UI.
    • Enhanced T-SQL Support: Query your Eventhouse data using both KQL and a more robust T-SQL surface area.
    • AI-Powered Future: Tap into the power of Copilot and other AI capabilities inherent to the Fabric platform.

    Phase 1: Assess and Plan Your Migration

    Before you move a single byte of data, you need a clear inventory of your current ADX environment.

    A hand-drawn flowchart infographic detailing the three key steps for a Synapse to Fabric migration: Assess & Plan, Migrate Data, and Update Reports.
    1. Document Your Clusters: List all your ADX clusters, databases, and tables.
    2. Analyze Ingestion Pipelines: Identify all data sources. Are you using Event Hubs, IoT Hubs, or custom scripts?
    3. Map Downstream Consumers: Who and what consumes this data? Document all Power BI reports, dashboards, Grafana instances, and applications that query ADX.
    4. Export Your Schema: You’ll need the schema for every table and function. Use the .show and .get commands in the ADX query editor to script your objects.

    Example: Scripting a Table Schema

    Run this KQL command in your Azure Data Explorer query window to get the creation command for a specific table.

    .get table YourTableName schema as csl

    This will output the .create table command with all columns, data types, and folder/docstring properties. Save these scripts for each table. Do the same for your functions using .show function YourFunctionName.

    Phase 2: The Migration – Data and Schema

    With your plan in place, it’s time to create your new home in Fabric and move your data.

    Step 1: Create a KQL Database and Eventhouse in Fabric

    1. Navigate to your Microsoft Fabric workspace.
    2. Select the Real-Time Analytics experience.
    3. Create a new KQL Database.
    4. Within your KQL Database, Fabric automatically provisions an Eventhouse. This is your primary database for analysis. You can also create “KQL Querysets” which are like saved query collections.

    Step 2: Recreate Your Schema

    Using the scripts you exported in Phase 1, run the .create table and .create function commands in your new Fabric KQL Database query window.

    Step 3: Migrate Your Data

    For historical data, the most effective method is exporting from ADX to Parquet format in Azure Data Lake Storage (ADLS) Gen2 and then ingesting into Fabric.

    Example: One-Time Data Ingestion with a Fabric Pipeline

    1. Export from ADX: Use the .export command in ADX to push your historical table data to a container in ADLS Gen2.Code snippet.
    2. Ingest into Fabric: In your Fabric workspace, create a new Data Pipeline.
    3. Use the Copy data activity.
      • Source: Connect to your ADLS Gen2 account and point to the exported Parquet files.
      • Destination: Select “Workspace” and choose your KQL Database and target table.
    4. Run the pipeline. Fabric will handle the ingestion into your Eventhouse table with optimized performance.
    .export async to parquet (
        h@"abfss://your-container@your-storage-account.dfs.core.windows.net/path/to/export"
    )
    <|
    YourTableName

    For ongoing data streams, you will re-point your Event Hubs or IoT Hubs from your old ADX cluster to your new Fabric Eventstream or KQL Database connection string.

    Phase 3: Update Queries and Reports

    Most of your KQL queries will work in Fabric without modification. The primary task here is updating connection strings in your downstream tools.

    Connecting Power BI to Fabric Eventhouse:

    This is where the integration shines.

    1. Open Power BI Desktop.
    2. Click Get Data.
    3. Search for the KQL Database connector.
    4. Instead of a cluster URI, you’ll see a simple dialog to select your Fabric workspace and the specific KQL Database.
    5. Select DirectQuery for real-time analysis.

    Your existing Power BI data models and DAX measures should work seamlessly once the connection is updated.

    Example: Updating an Application Connection

    If you have an application using the ADX SDK, you will need to update the connection string.

    • Old ADX Connection String: https://youradxcluster.kusto.windows.net
    • New Fabric KQL DB Connection String: https://your-fabric-workspace.kusto.fabric.microsoft.com

    You can find the exact query URI in the Fabric portal on your KQL Database’s details page.

    Embracing the Future

    Completing your Synapse to Fabric migration is more than a technical task—it’s a strategic step into the future of data analytics. By consolidating your workloads, you reduce complexity, unlock powerful new AI capabilities, and empower your team with a truly unified platform. Start planning today to ensure you’re ahead of the curve.

    Further Reading & Official Resources

    For those looking to dive deeper, here are the official Microsoft documents and resources to guide your migration and learning journey:

    1. Official Microsoft Documentation: Migrate to Real-Time Analytics in Fabric
    2. Microsoft Fabric Real-Time Analytics Overview
    3. Quickstart: Create a KQL Database
    4. Get data into a KQL database
    5. OneLake, the OneDrive for Data
    6. Microsoft Fabric Community Forum
  • AI Data Agent Guide 2025: Snowflake Cortex Tutorial

    AI Data Agent Guide 2025: Snowflake Cortex Tutorial

    The world of data analytics is changing. For years, accessing insights required writing complex SQL queries. However, the industry is now shifting towards a more intuitive, conversational approach. At the forefront of this revolution is agentic AI—intelligent systems that can understand human language, reason, plan, and automate complex tasks.

    Snowflake is leading this charge by transforming its platform into an intelligent and conversational AI Data Cloud. With the recent introduction of Snowflake Cortex Agents, they have provided a powerful tool for developers and data teams to build their own custom AI assistants.

    This guide will walk you through, step-by-step, how to build your very first AI data agent. You will learn how to create an agent that can answer complex questions by pulling information from both your database tables and your unstructured documents, all using simple, natural language.

    What is a Snowflake Cortex Agent and Why Does it Matter?

    First and foremost, a Snowflake Cortex Agent is an AI-powered assistant that you can build on top of your own data. Think of it as a chatbot that has expert knowledge of your business. It understands your data landscape and can perform complex analytical tasks based on simple, conversational prompts.

    This is a game-changer for several reasons:

    • It Democratizes Data: Business users no longer need to know SQL. Instead, they can ask questions like, “What were our top-selling products in the last quarter?” and get immediate, accurate answers.
    • It Automates Analysis: Consequently, data teams are freed from writing repetitive, ad-hoc queries. They can now focus on more strategic initiatives while the agent handles routine data exploration.
    • It Provides Unified Insights: Most importantly, a Cortex Agent can synthesize information from multiple sources. It can query your structured sales data from a table and cross-reference it with strategic goals mentioned in a PDF document, all in a single response.

    The Blueprint: How a Cortex Agent Works

    Under the hood, a Cortex Agent uses a simple yet powerful workflow to answer your questions. It orchestrates several of Snowflake’s Cortex AI features to deliver a comprehensive answer.

    Whiteboard-style flowchart showing how a Snowflake Cortex Agent works by using Cortex Analyst for SQL and Cortex Search for documents to provide an answer.
    1. Planning: The agent first analyzes your natural language question to understand your intent. It figures out what information you need and where it might be located.
    2. Tool Use: Next, it intelligently chooses the right tool for the job. If it needs to query structured data, it uses Cortex Analyst to generate and run SQL. If it needs to find information in your documents, it uses Cortex Search.
    3. Reflection: Finally, after gathering the data, the agent evaluates the results. It might ask for clarification, refine its approach, or synthesize the information into a clear, concise answer before presenting it to you.

    Step-by-Step Tutorial: Building a Sales Analysis Agent

    Now, let’s get hands-on. We will build a simple yet powerful sales analysis agent. This agent will be able to answer questions about sales figures from a table and also reference goals from a quarterly business review (QBR) document.

    Hand-drawn illustration of preparing data for Snowflake, showing a database and a document being placed into a container with the Snowflake logo.

    Prerequisites

    • A Snowflake account with ACCOUNTADMIN privileges.
    • A warehouse to run the queries.

    Step 1: Prepare Your Data

    First, we need some data to work with. Let’s create two simple tables for sales and products, and then upload a sample PDF document.

    Run the following SQL in a Snowflake worksheet:

    -- Create our database and schema
    CREATE DATABASE IF NOT EXISTS AGENT_DEMO;
    CREATE SCHEMA IF NOT EXISTS AGENT_DEMO.SALES;
    USE SCHEMA AGENT_DEMO.SALES;
    
    -- Create a products table
    CREATE OR REPLACE TABLE PRODUCTS (
        product_id INT,
        product_name VARCHAR,
        category VARCHAR
    );
    
    INSERT INTO PRODUCTS (product_id, product_name, category) VALUES
    (101, 'Quantum Laptop', 'Electronics'),
    (102, 'Nebula Smartphone', 'Electronics'),
    (103, 'Stardust Keyboard', 'Accessories');
    
    -- Create a sales table
    CREATE OR REPLACE TABLE SALES (
        sale_id INT,
        product_id INT,
        sale_date DATE,
        sale_amount DECIMAL(10, 2)
    );
    
    INSERT INTO SALES (sale_id, product_id, sale_date, sale_amount) VALUES
    (1, 101, '2025-09-01', 1200.00),
    (2, 102, '2025-09-05', 800.00),
    (3, 101, '2025-09-15', 1250.00),
    (4, 103, '2025-09-20', 150.00);
    
    -- Create a stage for our unstructured documents
    CREATE OR REPLACE STAGE qbr_documents;

    Now, create a simple text file named QBR_Report_Q3.txt on your local machine with the following content and upload it to the qbr_documents stage using the Snowsight UI.

    Quarterly Business Review – Q3 2025 Summary

    Our primary strategic goal for Q3 was to drive the adoption of our new flagship product, the ‘Quantum Laptop’. We aimed for a sales target of over $2,000 for this product. Secondary goals included expanding our market share in the accessories category.

    Step 2: Create the Semantic Model

    Next, we need to teach the agent about our structured data. We do this by creating a Semantic Model. This is a YAML file that defines our tables, columns, and how they relate to each other.

    # semantic_model.yaml
    model:
      name: sales_insights_model
      tables:
        - name: SALES
          columns:
            - name: sale_id
              type: INT
            - name: product_id
              type: INT
            - name: sale_date
              type: DATE
            - name: sale_amount
              type: DECIMAL
        - name: PRODUCTS
          columns:
            - name: product_id
              type: INT
            - name: product_name
              type: VARCHAR
            - name: category
              type: VARCHAR
      joins:
        - from: SALES
          to: PRODUCTS
          on: SALES.product_id = PRODUCTS.product_id

    Save this as semantic_model.yaml and upload it to the @qbr_documents stage.

    Step 3: Create the Cortex Search Service

    Now, let’s make our PDF document searchable. We create a Cortex Search Service on the stage where we uploaded our file.

    CREATE OR REPLACE CORTEX SEARCH SERVICE sales_qbr_service
        ON @qbr_documents
        TARGET_LAG = '0 seconds'
        WAREHOUSE = 'COMPUTE_WH';

    Step 4: Combine Them into a Cortex Agent

    With all the pieces in place, we can now create our agent. This single SQL statement brings together our semantic model (for SQL queries) and our search service (for document queries).

    CREATE OR REPLACE CORTEX AGENT sales_agent
        MODEL = 'mistral-large',
        CORTEX_SEARCH_SERVICES = [sales_qbr_service],
        SEMANTIC_MODELS = ['@qbr_documents/semantic_model.yaml'];

    Step 5: Ask Your Agent Questions!

    The agent is now ready! You can interact with it using the CALL command. Let’s try a few questions.

    A hand-drawn sketch of a computer screen showing a user asking questions to a Snowflake Cortex Agent and receiving instant, insightful answers.

    First up: A simple structured data query.

    CALL sales_agent('What were our total sales?');

    Next: A more complex query involving joins.

    CALL sales_agent('Which product had the highest revenue?');

    Then comes: A question for our unstructured document.

    CALL sales_agent('Summarize our strategic goals from the latest QBR report.');
    

    Finally , the magic: The magic! A question that combines both.

    CALL sales_agent('Did we meet our sales target for the Quantum Laptop as mentioned in the QBR?');

    This final query demonstrates the true power of a Snowflake Cortex Agent. It will first query the SALES and PRODUCTS tables to calculate the total sales for the “Quantum Laptop.” Then, it will use Cortex Search to find the sales target mentioned in the QBR document. Finally, it will compare the two and give you a complete, synthesized answer.

    Conclusion: The Future is Conversational

    You have just built a powerful AI data agent in a matter of minutes. This is a fundamental shift in how we interact with data. By combining natural language processing with the power to query both structured and unstructured data, Snowflake Cortex Agents are paving the way for a future where data-driven insights are accessible to everyone in an organization.

    As Snowflake continues to innovate with features like Adaptive Compute and Gen-2 Warehouses, running these AI workloads will only become faster and more efficient. The era of conversational analytics has arrived, and it’s built on the Snowflake AI Data Cloud.


    Additional materials

  • Mastering Real-Time ETL with Google Cloud Dataflow: A Comprehensive Tutorial

    Mastering Real-Time ETL with Google Cloud Dataflow: A Comprehensive Tutorial

    In the fast-paced world of data engineering, mastering real-time ETL with Google Cloud Dataflow is a game-changer for businesses needing instant insights. Extract, Transform, Load (ETL) processes are evolving from batch to real-time, and Google Cloud Dataflow stands out as a powerful, serverless solution for building streaming data pipelines. This tutorial dives into how Dataflow enables efficient, scalable data processing, its integration with other Google Cloud Platform (GCP) services, and practical steps to get started in 2025.

    Whether you’re processing live IoT data, monitoring user activity, or analyzing financial transactions, Dataflow’s ability to handle real-time streams makes it a top choice. Let’s explore its benefits, setup process, and a hands-on example to help you master real-time ETL with Google Cloud Dataflow.

    Why Choose Google Cloud Dataflow for Real-Time ETL?

    Google Cloud Dataflow offers a unified platform for batch and streaming data processing, powered by the Apache Beam SDK. Its serverless nature eliminates the need to manage infrastructure, allowing you to focus on pipeline logic.

    Hand-drawn illustration depicting the serverless architecture of Google Cloud Dataflow for efficient real-time ETL processing.

    Key benefits include:

    • Serverless Architecture: Automatically scales resources based on workload, reducing operational overhead and costs.
    • Seamless GCP Integration: Works effortlessly with BigQuery, Pub/Sub, Cloud Storage, and Data Studio, creating an end-to-end data ecosystem.
    • Real-Time Processing: Handles continuous data streams with low latency, ideal for time-sensitive applications.
    • Flexibility: Supports multiple languages (Java, Python) and custom transformations via Apache Beam.

    For businesses in 2025, where real-time analytics drive decisions, Dataflow’s ability to process millions of events per second positions it as a leader in cloud-based ETL solutions.

    Setting Up Google Cloud Dataflow

    Before building pipelines, set up your GCP environment:

    1. Create a GCP Project: Go to the Google Cloud Console and create a new project.
    2. Enable Dataflow API: Navigate to APIs & Services > Library, search for “Dataflow API,” and enable it.
    3. Install SDK: Use the Cloud SDK or install the Apache Beam SDK:
    pip install apache-beam[gcp]

    4. Authenticate: Run gcloud auth login and set your project with gcloud config set project PROJECT_ID.

    This setup ensures you’re ready to deploy and manage real-time ETL with Google Cloud Dataflow pipelines.

    Building a Real-Time Streaming Pipeline

    Let’s create a simple pipeline to process real-time data from Google Cloud Pub/Sub, transform it, and load it into BigQuery. This example streams simulated sensor data and calculates average values.

    Hand-drawn diagram of a real-time ETL pipeline using Google Cloud Dataflow, from Pub/Sub to BigQuery
    Step-by-Step Code Example
    import apache_beam as beam
    from apache_beam.options.pipeline_options import PipelineOptions
    import json
    
    class DataflowOptions(PipelineOptions):
        @classmethod
        def _add_argparse_args(cls, parser):
            parser.add_argument('--input_subscription', default='projects/your-project/subscriptions/your-subscription')
            parser.add_argument('--output_table', default='your-project:dataset.table')
    
    def run():
        options = DataflowOptions()
        with beam.Pipeline(options=options) as p:
            # Read from Pub/Sub
            data = (p
                    | 'Read from Pub/Sub' >> beam.io.ReadFromPubSub(subscription=options.input_subscription)
                    | 'Decode JSON' >> beam.Map(lambda x: json.loads(x.decode('utf-8')))
                    )
    
            # Transform: Calculate average sensor value
            averages = (data
                        | 'Group by Sensor' >> beam.GroupByKey()
                        | 'Compute Average' >> beam.MapTuple(lambda k, v: (k, sum(v) / len(v) if v else 0))
                        )
    
            # Write to BigQuery
            averages | 'Write to BigQuery' >> beam.io.WriteToBigQuery(
                options.output_table,
                schema='sensor_id:STRING,average_value:FLOAT',
                write_disposition=beam.io.BigQueryDisposition.WRITE_APPEND,
                create_disposition=beam.io.BigQueryDisposition.CREATE_IF_NEEDED
            )
    
    if __name__ == '__main__':
        run()
    How It Works
    • Input: Subscribes to a Pub/Sub topic streaming JSON data (e.g., {“sensor_id”: “S1”, “value”: 25.5}).
    • Transform: Groups data by sensor ID and computes the running average.
    • Output: Loads results into a BigQuery table for real-time analysis.

    Run this pipeline with:

    python your_script.py --project=your-project --job_name=real-time-etl --runner=DataflowRunner --region=us-central1 --setup_file=./setup.py

    This example showcases real-time ETL with Google Cloud Dataflow’s power to process and store data instantly.

    Integrating with Other GCP Services

    Dataflow shines with its ecosystem integration:

    Hand-drawn overview of Google Cloud Dataflow's integrations with GCP services like Pub/Sub and BigQuery for real-time ETL
    • Pub/Sub: Ideal for ingesting real-time event streams from IoT devices or web applications.
    • Cloud Storage: Use as a staging area for intermediate data or backups.
    • BigQuery: Enables SQL-based analytics on processed data.
    • Data Studio: Visualize results in dashboards for stakeholders.

    For instance, connect Pub/Sub to stream live user clicks, transform them with Dataflow, and visualize trends in Data Studio—all within minutes.

    Best Practices for Real-Time ETL with Dataflow

    • Optimize Resources: Use autoscaling and monitor CPU/memory usage in the Dataflow monitoring UI.
    • Handle Errors: Implement dead-letter queues in Pub/Sub for failed messages.
    • Security: Enable IAM roles and encrypt data with Cloud KMS.
    • Testing: Test pipelines locally with DirectRunner before deploying.

    These practices ensure robust, scalable real-time ETL with Google Cloud Dataflow pipelines.

    Benefits in 2025 and Beyond

    As of October 2025, Dataflow’s serverless model aligns with the growing demand for cost-efficient, scalable solutions. Its integration with AI/ML services like Vertex AI for predictive analytics further enhances its value. Companies leveraging real-time ETL report up to 40% faster decision-making, according to recent industry trends.

    External Resource Links

    For deeper dives and references:

    Conclusion

    Mastering real-time ETL with Google Cloud Dataflow unlocks the potential of streaming data pipelines. Its serverless design, GCP integration, and flexibility make it ideal for modern data challenges. Start with the example above, experiment with your data, and scale as needed.

  • Star Schema vs Snowflake Schema:Key Differences & Use Cases

    Star Schema vs Snowflake Schema:Key Differences & Use Cases

    In the realm of data warehousing, choosing the right schema design is crucial for efficient data management, querying, and analysis. Two of the most popular multidimensional schemas are the star schema and the snowflake schema. These schemas organize data into fact tables (containing measurable metrics) and dimension tables (providing context like who, what, when, and where). Understanding star schema vs snowflake schema helps data engineers, analysts, and architects build scalable systems that support business intelligence (BI) tools and advanced analytics.

    This comprehensive guide delves into their structures, pros, cons, when to use each, real-world examples, and which one dominates in modern data practices as of 2025. We’ll also include visual illustrations to make concepts clearer, along with references to authoritative sources for deeper reading.

    What is a Star Schema?

    A star schema is a denormalized data model resembling a star, with a central fact table surrounded by dimension tables. The fact table holds quantitative data (e.g., sales amounts, quantities) and foreign keys linking to dimensions. Dimension tables store descriptive attributes (e.g., product names, customer details) and are not further normalized.

    Hand-drawn star schema diagram for data warehousing

    Advantages of Star Schema:

    • Simplicity and Ease of Use: Fewer tables mean simpler queries with minimal joins, making it intuitive for end-users and BI tools like Tableau or Power BI.
    • Faster Query Performance: Denormalization reduces join operations, leading to quicker aggregations and reports, especially on large datasets.
    • Better for Reporting: Ideal for OLAP (Online Analytical Processing) where speed is prioritized over storage efficiency.

    Disadvantages of Star Schema:

    • Data Redundancy: Denormalization can lead to duplicated data in dimension tables, increasing storage needs and risking inconsistencies during updates.
    • Limited Flexibility for Complex Hierarchies: It struggles with intricate relationships, such as multi-level product categories.

    In practice, star schemas are favored in environments where query speed trumps everything else. For instance, in a retail data warehouse, the fact table might record daily sales metrics, while dimensions cover products, customers, stores, and dates. This setup allows quick answers to questions like “What were the total sales by product category last quarter?”

    What is a Snowflake Schema?

    A snowflake schema is an extension of the star schema but with normalized dimension tables. Here, dimensions are broken down into sub-dimension tables to eliminate redundancy, creating a structure that branches out like a snowflake. The fact table remains central, but dimensions are hierarchical and normalized to third normal form (3NF).

    Hand-drawn star schema diagram for data warehousing

    Advantages of Snowflake Schema:

    • Storage Efficiency: Normalization reduces data duplication, saving disk space—crucial for massive datasets in cloud environments like AWS or Snowflake (the data warehouse platform).
    • Improved Data Integrity: By minimizing redundancy, updates are easier and less error-prone, maintaining consistency across the warehouse.
    • Handles Complex Relationships: Better suited for detailed hierarchies, such as product categories subdivided into brands, suppliers, and regions.

    Disadvantages of Snowflake Schema:

    • Slower Query Performance: More joins are required, which can slow down queries on large volumes of data.
    • Increased Complexity: The normalized structure is harder to understand and maintain, potentially complicating BI tool integrations.

    For example, in the same retail scenario, a snowflake schema might normalize the product dimension into separate tables for products, categories, and suppliers. This allows precise queries like “Sales by supplier region” without redundant storage, but at the cost of additional joins.

    Key Differences Between Star Schema and Snowflake Schema

    To highlight star schema vs snowflake schema, here’s a comparison table:

    AspectStar SchemaSnowflake Schema
    NormalizationDenormalized (1NF or 2NF)Normalized (3NF)
    StructureCentral fact table with direct dimension tablesFact table with hierarchical sub-dimensions
    JoinsFewer joins, faster queriesMore joins, potentially slower
    StorageHigher due to redundancyLower, more efficient
    ComplexitySimple and user-friendlyMore complex, better for integrity
    Query SpeedHighModerate to low
    Data RedundancyHighLow

    These differences stem from their design philosophies: star focuses on performance, while snowflake emphasizes efficiency and accuracy.

    When to Use Star Schema vs Snowflake Schema

    • Use Star Schema When:
      • Speed is critical (e.g., real-time dashboards).
      • Data models are simple without deep hierarchies.
      • Storage cost isn’t a concern with cheap cloud options.
      • Example: An e-commerce firm uses star schema for rapid sales trend analysis.
    • Use Snowflake Schema When:
      • Storage optimization is key for massive datasets.
      • Complex hierarchies exist (e.g., supply chain layers).
      • Data integrity is paramount during updates.
      • Example: A healthcare provider uses snowflake to manage patient and provider hierarchies.

    Hybrid approaches exist, but pure star schemas are often preferred for balance.

    Which is Used Most in 2025?

    As of 2025, the star schema remains the most commonly used in data warehousing. Its simplicity aligns with the rise of self-service BI tools and cloud platforms like Snowflake and BigQuery, where query optimization mitigates some denormalization drawbacks. Surveys and industry reports indicate that over 70% of data warehouses favor star schemas for their performance advantages, especially in agile environments. Snowflake schemas, while efficient, are more niche—used in about 20-30% of cases where normalization is essential, such as regulated industries like finance or healthcare.

    However, with advancements in columnar storage and indexing, the performance gap is narrowing, making snowflake viable for more use cases.

    Solid Examples in Action

    Consider a healthcare analytics warehouse:

    • Star Schema Example: Fact table tracks patient visits (metrics: visit count, cost). Dimensions: Patient (ID, name, age), Doctor (ID, specialty), Date (year, month), Location (hospital, city). Queries like “Average cost per doctor specialty in 2024” run swiftly with simple joins.
    • Snowflake Schema Example: Normalize the Doctor dimension into Doctor (ID, name), Specialty (ID, type, department), and Department (ID, head). This reduces redundancy if specialties change often, but requires extra joins for the same query.

    In a financial reporting system, star might aggregate transaction data quickly for dashboards, while snowflake ensures normalized account hierarchies for compliance audits.

    Best Practices and References

    To implement effectively:

    • Start with business requirements: Prioritize speed or efficiency?
    • Use tools like dbt or ERwin for modeling.
    • Test performance with sample data.

    For more, check these resources:

    In conclusion, while star schema vs snowflake schema both serve data warehousing, star’s dominance in 2025 underscores the value of simplicity in a fast-paced data landscape. Choose based on your workload—performance for star, efficiency for snowflake—and watch your analytics thrive.

  • Mastering Python Data Pipelines: Extract from APIs & Databases, Load to S3 & Snowflake

    Mastering Python Data Pipelines: Extract from APIs & Databases, Load to S3 & Snowflake

    Introduction to Data Pipelines in Python

    In today’s data-driven world, creating robust data pipelines solutions is essential for businesses to handle large volumes of information efficiently. Whether you’re pulling data from RESTful APIs or external databases, the goal is to extract, transform, and load (ETL) it reliably. This guide walks you through building data pipelines using Python that fetch data from multiple sources, store it in Amazon S3 for scalable storage, and load it into Snowflake for advanced analytics.

    By leveraging Python’s powerful libraries like requests for APIs, sqlalchemy for databases, boto3 for S3, and the Snowflake connector, you can automate these processes. This approach ensures data integrity, scalability, and cost-effectiveness, making it ideal for data engineers and developers.

    Why Use Python for Data Pipelines?

    Python stands out due to its simplicity, extensive ecosystem, and community support. Key benefits include:

    best practices in data engineering
    • Ease of Integration: Seamlessly connect to APIs, databases, S3, and Snowflake.
    • Scalability: Handle large datasets with libraries like Pandas for transformations.
    • Automation: Use schedulers like Airflow or cron jobs to run pipelines periodically.
    • Cost-Effective: Open-source tools reduce overhead compared to proprietary ETL software.

    If you’re dealing with real-time data ingestion or batch processing, Python’s flexibility makes it a top choice for modern data pipelines.

    Step 1: Extracting Data from APIs

    Extracting data from APIs is a common starting point in data pipelines. We’ll use the requests library to fetch JSON data from a public API, such as a weather service or GitHub API.

    First, install the necessary packages:

    pip install requests pandas

    Here’s a sample Python script to extract data from an API:

    import requests
    import pandas as pd
    
    def extract_from_api(api_url):
        try:
            response = requests.get(api_url)
            response.raise_for_status()  # Raise error for bad status codes
            data = response.json()
            # Assuming the data is in a list under 'results' key
            df = pd.DataFrame(data.get('results', []))
            print(f"Extracted {len(df)} records from API.")
            return df
        except requests.exceptions.RequestException as e:
            print(f"API extraction error: {e}")
            return pd.DataFrame()
    
    # Example usage
    api_url = "https://api.example.com/data"  # Replace with your API endpoint
    api_data = extract_from_api(api_url)

    This function handles errors gracefully and converts the API response into a Pandas DataFrame for easy manipulation in your data pipelines Python.

    Step 2: Extracting Data from External Databases

    For external databases like MySQL, PostgreSQL, or Oracle, use sqlalchemy to connect and query data. This is crucial for data pipelines involving legacy systems or third-party DBs.

    Install the required libraries:

    pip install sqlalchemy pandas mysql-connector-python  # Adjust driver for your DB

    Sample code to extract from a MySQL database:

    from sqlalchemy import create_engine
    import pandas as pd
    
    def extract_from_db(db_url, query):
        try:
            engine = create_engine(db_url)
            df = pd.read_sql_query(query, engine)
            print(f"Extracted {len(df)} records from database.")
            return df
        except Exception as e:
            print(f"Database extraction error: {e}")
            return pd.DataFrame()
    
    # Example usage
    db_url = "mysql+mysqlconnector://user:password@host:port/dbname"  # Replace with your credentials
    query = "SELECT * FROM your_table WHERE date > '2023-01-01'"
    db_data = extract_from_db(db_url, query)

    This method ensures secure connections and efficient data retrieval, forming a solid foundation for your pipelines in Python.

    Step 3: Transforming Data (Optional ETL Step)

    Before loading, transform the data using Pandas. For instance, merge API and DB data, clean duplicates, or apply calculations.

    # Assuming api_data and db_data are DataFrames
    merged_data = pd.merge(api_data, db_data, on='common_column', how='inner')
    merged_data.drop_duplicates(inplace=True)
    merged_data['new_column'] = merged_data['value1'] + merged_data['value2']

    This step in data pipelines ensures data quality and relevance.

    Step 4: Loading Data to Amazon S3

    Amazon S3 provides durable, scalable storage for your extracted data. Use boto3 to upload files.

    Install boto3:

    pip install boto3

    Code example:

    import boto3
    import io
    
    def load_to_s3(df, bucket_name, file_key, aws_access_key, aws_secret_key):
        try:
            s3_client = boto3.client('s3', aws_access_key_id=aws_access_key, aws_secret_access_key=aws_secret_key)
            csv_buffer = io.StringIO()
            df.to_csv(csv_buffer, index=False)
            s3_client.put_object(Bucket=bucket_name, Key=file_key, Body=csv_buffer.getvalue())
            print(f"Data loaded to S3: {bucket_name}/{file_key}")
        except Exception as e:
            print(f"S3 upload error: {e}")
    
    # Example usage
    bucket = "your-s3-bucket"
    key = "data/processed_data.csv"
    load_to_s3(merged_data, bucket, key, "your_access_key", "your_secret_key")  # Use environment variables for security

    Storing in S3 acts as an intermediate layer in data pipelines, enabling versioning and easy access.

    Step 5: Loading Data into Snowflake

    Finally, load the data from S3 into Snowflake for querying and analytics. Use the Snowflake Python connector.

    Install the connector:

    pip install snowflake-connector-python pandas

    Sample Script:

    import snowflake.connector
    import pandas as pd
    
    def load_to_snowflake(df, snowflake_account, user, password, warehouse, db, schema, table):
        try:
            conn = snowflake.connector.connect(
                user=user,
                password=password,
                account=snowflake_account,
                warehouse=warehouse,
                database=db,
                schema=schema
            )
            cur = conn.cursor()
            # Create table if not exists (simplified)
            cur.execute(f"CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS {table} (col1 VARCHAR, col2 INT)")  # Adjust schema
            # Load data using Pandas to_sql (for small datasets; use COPY for large ones)
            df.to_sql(table, con=conn, schema=schema, if_exists='append', index=False)
            print(f"Data loaded to Snowflake table: {table}")
        except Exception as e:
            print(f"Snowflake load error: {e}")
        finally:
            cur.close()
            conn.close()
    
    # Example usage
    load_to_snowflake(merged_data, "your-account", "user", "password", "warehouse", "db", "schema", "your_table")

    For larger datasets, use Snowflake’s COPY INTO command with S3 stages for better performance in data pipelines Python.

    Best Practices for Data Pipelines in Python

    • Error Handling: Always include try-except blocks to prevent pipeline failures.
    • Security: Use environment variables or AWS Secrets Manager for credentials.
    • Scheduling: Integrate with Apache Airflow or AWS Lambda for automated runs.
    • Monitoring: Log activities and use tools like Datadog for pipeline health.
    • Scalability: For big data, consider PySpark or Dask instead of Pandas.

    Conclusion

    Building data pipelines Python from APIs and databases to S3 and Snowflake streamlines your ETL workflows, enabling faster insights. With the code examples provided, you can start implementing these pipelines today. If you’re optimizing for cloud efficiency, this setup reduces costs while boosting performance.

    Additional materials

  • Revolutionizing Finance: A Deep Dive into Snowflake’s Cortex AI

    Revolutionizing Finance: A Deep Dive into Snowflake’s Cortex AI

    The financial services industry is in the midst of a technological revolution. At the heart of this change lies Artificial Intelligence. Consequently, financial institutions are constantly seeking new ways to innovate and enhance security. They also want to deliver personalized customer experiences. However, they face a significant hurdle: navigating fragmented data while adhering to strict compliance and governance requirements. To solve this, Snowflake has introduced Cortex AI for Financial Services, a groundbreaking suite of tools designed to unlock the full potential of AI in the sector.

    What is Snowflake Cortex AI for Financial Services?

    First and foremost, Snowflake Cortex AI is a comprehensive suite of AI capabilities. It empowers financial organizations to unify their data and securely deploy AI models, applications, and agents. By bringing AI directly to the data, Snowflake eliminates the need to move sensitive information. As a result, security and governance are greatly enhanced. This approach allows institutions to leverage their own proprietary data alongside third-party sources and cutting-edge large language models (LLMs). Ultimately, this helps them automate complex tasks and derive faster, more accurate insights.

    Key Capabilities Driving the Transformation

    Cortex AI for Financial Services is built on a foundation of powerful features. These are specifically designed to accelerate AI adoption within the financial industry.

    • Snowflake Data Science Agent: This AI-powered coding assistant automates many time-consuming tasks for data scientists. For instance, it handles data cleaning, feature engineering, and model prototyping. This, in turn, accelerates the development of crucial workflows like risk modeling and fraud detection.
    • Cortex AISQL: With its AI-powered functions, Cortex AISQL allows users to process and analyze unstructured data at scale. This includes market research, earnings call transcripts, and transaction details. Therefore, it transforms workflows in customer service, investment analytics, and claims processing.
    • Snowflake Intelligence: Furthermore, this feature provides business users with an intuitive, conversational interface. They can query both structured and unstructured data using natural language. This “democratization” of data access means even non-technical users can gain valuable insights without writing complex SQL.
    • Managed Model Context Protocol (MCP) Server: The MCP Server is a true game-changer. It securely connects proprietary data with third-party data from partners like FactSet and MSCI. In addition, it provides a standardized method for LLMs to integrate with data APIs, which eliminates the need for custom work and speeds up the delivery of AI applications.

    Use Cases: Putting Cortex AI to Work in Finance

    The practical applications of Snowflake Cortex AI in the financial services industry are vast and transformative:

    • Fraud Detection and Prevention: By training models on historical transaction data, institutions can identify suspicious patterns in real time. Consequently, this proactive approach helps minimize losses and protect customers.
    • Credit Risk Analysis: Cortex Analyst, a key feature, can analyze vast amounts of transaction data to assess credit risk. By building a semantic model, for example, financial institutions can enable more accurate and nuanced risk assessments.
    • Algorithmic Trading Support:While not a trading platform itself, Snowflake’s infrastructure supports algorithmic strategies. Specifically, Cortex AI provides powerful tools for data analysis, pattern identification, and model development..
    • Enhanced Customer Service: Moreover, AI agents powered by Cortex AI can create sophisticated customer support systems. These agents can analyze customer data to provide personalized assistance and automate tasks, leading to improved satisfaction.
    • Market and Investment Analysis: Cortex AI can also analyze a wide range of data sources, from earnings calls to market news. This provides real-time insights that are crucial for making informed and timely investment decisions.

    The Benefits of a Unified AI and Data Strategy

    By adopting Snowflake Cortex AI, financial institutions can realize a multitude of benefits:

    • Enhanced Security and Governance: By bringing AI to the data, sensitive financial information remains within Snowflake’s secure and governed environment.
    • Faster Innovation: Automating data science tasks allows for the rapid development and deployment of new products.
    • Democratization of Data: Natural language interfaces empower more users to access and analyze data directly.
    • Reduced Operational Costs: Finally, the automation of complex tasks leads to significant cost savings and increased efficiency.

    Getting Started with Snowflake Cortex AI

    For institutions ready to begin their AI journey, the path is clear. The Snowflake Quickstarts offer a wealth of tutorials and guides. These resources provide step-by-step instructions on how to set up the environment, create models, and build powerful applications.

    The Future of Finance is Here

    In conclusion, Snowflake Cortex AI for Financial Services represents a pivotal moment for the industry. By providing a secure, scalable, and unified platform, Snowflake is empowering financial institutions to seize the opportunities of tomorrow. The ability to seamlessly integrate data with the latest AI technology will undoubtedly be a key differentiator in the competitive landscape of finance.


    Additional Sources

  • Snowflake Data Science Agent: Automate ML Workflows 2025

    Snowflake Data Science Agent: Automate ML Workflows 2025

    The 60–80% Problem Killing Data Science Productivity

    Data science productivity is being crushed by the 60–80% problem. Despite powerful platforms like Snowflake and cutting-edge ML tools, data scientists still spend the majority of their time—60 to 80 percent—on repetitive tasks like data cleaning, feature engineering, and environment setup. This bottleneck is stalling innovation and delaying insights that drive business value.

    Data scientists spend 60-80% time on repetitive tasks vs strategic work

    A typical ML project timeline looks like this:

    • Weeks 1-2: Finding datasets, setting up environments, searching for similar projects
    • Weeks 3-4: Data preprocessing, exploratory analysis, feature engineering
    • Weeks 5-6: Model selection, hyperparameter tuning, training
    • Weeks 7-8: Evaluation, documentation, deployment preparation

    Only after this two-month slog do data scientists reach the interesting work: interpreting results and driving business impact.

    What if you could compress weeks of foundational ML work into under an hour?

    Enter the Snowflake Data Science Agent, announced at Snowflake Summit 2025 on June 3. This agentic AI companion automates routine ML development tasks, transforming how organizations build and deploy machine learning models.


    What is Snowflake Data Science Agent?

    Snowflake Data Science Agent is an autonomous AI assistant that automates the entire ML development lifecycle within the Snowflake environment. Currently in private preview with general availability expected in late 2025, it represents a fundamental shift in how data scientists work.

    Natural language prompt converting to production-ready ML code"
Placement

    The Core Innovation

    Rather than manually coding each step of an ML pipeline, data scientists describe their objective in natural language. The agent then:

    Understands Context: Analyzes available datasets, business requirements, and project goals

    Plans Strategy: Breaks down the ML problem into logical, executable steps

    Generates Code: Creates production-quality Python code for each pipeline component

    Executes Workflows: Runs the pipeline directly in Snowflake Notebooks with full observability

    Iterates Intelligently: Refines approaches based on results and user feedback

    Powered by Claude AI

    The Data Science Agent leverages Anthropic’s Claude large language model, running securely within Snowflake’s perimeter. This integration ensures that proprietary data never leaves the governed Snowflake environment while providing state-of-the-art reasoning capabilities.


    How Data Science Agent Transforms ML Workflows

    Traditional ML Pipeline vs. Agent-Assisted Pipeline

    Traditional Approach (4-8 Weeks):

    1. Manual dataset discovery and access setup (3-5 days)
    2. Exploratory data analysis with custom scripts (5-7 days)
    3. Data preprocessing and quality checks (7-10 days)
    4. Feature engineering experiments (5-7 days)
    5. Model selection and baseline training (3-5 days)
    6. Hyperparameter tuning iterations (7-10 days)
    7. Model evaluation and documentation (5-7 days)
    8. Deployment preparation and handoff (3-5 days)

    Agent-Assisted Approach (1-2 Days):

    1. Natural language project description (15 minutes)
    2. Agent generates complete pipeline (30-60 minutes)
    3. Review and customize generated code (2-3 hours)
    4. Execute and evaluate results (1-2 hours)
    5. Iterate with follow-up prompts (30 minutes per iteration)
    6. Production deployment (1-2 hours)

    The agent doesn’t eliminate human expertise—it amplifies it. Data scientists focus on problem formulation, result interpretation, and business strategy rather than boilerplate code.


    Key Capabilities and Features

    1. Automated Data Preparation

    The agent handles the most time-consuming aspects of data science:

    Data Profiling: Automatically analyzes distributions, identifies missing values, detects outliers, and assesses data quality

    Smart Preprocessing: Generates appropriate transformations based on data characteristics—normalization, encoding, imputation, scaling

    Feature Engineering: Creates relevant features using domain knowledge embedded in the model, including polynomial features, interaction terms, and temporal aggregations

    Data Validation: Implements checks to ensure data quality throughout the pipeline

    2. Intelligent Model Selection

    Rather than manually testing dozens of algorithms, the agent:

    Evaluates Problem Type: Classifies tasks as regression, classification, clustering, or time series

    Considers Constraints: Factors in dataset size, feature types, and performance requirements

    Recommends Algorithms: Suggests appropriate models with justification for each recommendation

    Implements Ensemble Methods: Combines multiple models when beneficial for accuracy

    3. Automated Hyperparameter Tuning

    The agent configures and executes optimization strategies:

    Grid Search: Systematic exploration of parameter spaces for small parameter sets

    Random Search: Efficient sampling for high-dimensional parameter spaces

    Bayesian Optimization: Intelligent search using previous results to guide exploration

    Early Stopping: Prevents overfitting and saves compute resources

    4. Production-Ready Code Generation

    Generated pipelines aren’t just prototypes—they’re production-quality:

    Modular Architecture: Clean, reusable functions with clear separation of concerns

    Error Handling: Robust exception handling and logging

    Documentation: Inline comments and docstrings explaining logic

    Version Control Ready: Structured for Git workflows and collaboration

    Snowflake Native: Optimized for Snowflake’s distributed computing environment

    5. Explainability and Transparency

    Understanding model behavior is crucial for trust and compliance:

    Feature Importance: Identifies which variables drive predictions

    SHAP Values: Explains individual predictions with Shapley values

    Model Diagnostics: Generates confusion matrices, ROC curves, and performance metrics

    Audit Trails: Logs all decisions, code changes, and model versions


    Real-World Use Cases

    Financial Services: Fraud Detection

    Challenge: A bank needs to detect fraudulent transactions in real-time with minimal false positives.

    Traditional Approach: Data science team spends 6 weeks building and tuning models, requiring deep SQL expertise, feature engineering knowledge, and model optimization skills.

    Data Science Agent use cases across finance, healthcare, retail, manufacturing

    With Data Science Agent:

    • Prompt: “Build a fraud detection model using transaction history, customer profiles, and merchant data. Optimize for 99% precision while maintaining 85% recall.”
    • Result: Agent generates a complete pipeline with ensemble methods, class imbalance handling, and real-time scoring infrastructure in under 2 hours
    • Impact: Model deployed 95% faster, freeing the team to work on sophisticated fraud pattern analysis

    Healthcare: Patient Risk Stratification

    Challenge: A hospital system wants to identify high-risk patients for proactive intervention.

    Traditional Approach: Clinical data analysts spend 8 weeks wrangling EHR data, building features from medical histories, and validating models against clinical outcomes.

    With Data Science Agent:

    • Prompt: “Create a patient risk stratification model using diagnoses, medications, lab results, and demographics. Focus on interpretability for clinical adoption.”
    • Result: Agent produces an explainable model with clinically meaningful features, SHAP explanations for each prediction, and validation against established risk scores
    • Impact: Clinicians trust the model due to transparency, leading to 40% adoption rate vs. typical 15%

    Retail: Customer Lifetime Value Prediction

    Challenge: An e-commerce company needs to predict customer lifetime value to optimize marketing spend.

    Traditional Approach: Marketing analytics team collaborates with data scientists for 5 weeks, iterating on feature definitions and model approaches.

    With Data Science Agent:

    • Prompt: “Predict 12-month customer lifetime value using purchase history, browsing behavior, and demographic data. Segment customers into high/medium/low value tiers.”
    • Result: Agent delivers a complete CLV model with customer segmentation, propensity scores, and a dashboard for marketing teams
    • Impact: Marketing ROI improves 32% through better targeting, model built 90% faster

    Manufacturing: Predictive Maintenance

    Challenge: A manufacturer wants to predict equipment failures before they occur to minimize downtime.

    Traditional Approach: Engineers and data scientists spend 7 weeks analyzing sensor data, building time-series features, and testing various forecasting approaches.

    With Data Science Agent:

    • Prompt: “Build a predictive maintenance model using sensor telemetry, maintenance logs, and operational data. Predict failures 24-48 hours in advance.”
    • Result: Agent creates a time-series model with automated feature extraction from streaming data, anomaly detection, and failure prediction
    • Impact: Unplanned downtime reduced by 28%, maintenance costs decreased by 19%

    Technical Architecture

    Integration with Snowflake Ecosystem

    The Data Science Agent operates natively within Snowflake’s architecture:

    Snowflake Data Science Agent architecture and ecosystem integration

    Snowflake Notebooks: All code generation and execution happens in collaborative notebooks

    Snowpark Python: Leverages Snowflake’s Python runtime for distributed computing

    Data Governance: Inherits existing row-level security, masking, and access controls

    Cortex AI Suite: Integrates with Cortex Analyst, Search, and AISQL for comprehensive AI capabilities

    ML Jobs: Automates model training, scheduling, and monitoring at scale

    How It Works: Behind the Scenes

    When a data scientist provides a natural language prompt:

    🔍Step 1: Understanding

    • Claude analyzes the request, identifying ML task type, success metrics, and constraints
    • Agent queries Snowflake’s catalog to discover relevant tables and understand schema

    🧠 Step 2: Planning

    • Generates a step-by-step execution plan covering data prep, modeling, and evaluation
    • Identifies required Snowflake features and libraries

    💻 Step 3: Code Generation

    • Creates executable Python code for each pipeline stage
    • Includes data validation, error handling, and logging

    🚀 Step 4: Execution

    • Runs generated code in Snowflake Notebooks with full visibility
    • Provides real-time progress updates and intermediate results

    📊 Step 5: Evaluation

    • Generates comprehensive model diagnostics and performance metrics
    • Recommends next steps based on results

    🔁 Step 6: Iteration

    • Accepts follow-up prompts to refine the model
    • Tracks changes and maintains version history

    Best Practices for Using Data Science Agent

    1. Write Clear, Specific Prompts

    Poor Prompt: “Build a model for sales”

    Good Prompt: “Create a weekly sales forecasting model for retail stores using historical sales, promotions, weather, and holidays. Optimize for MAPE under 10%. Include confidence intervals.”

    The more context you provide, the better the agent performs.

    2. Start with Business Context

    Begin prompts with the business problem and success criteria:

    • What decision will this model inform?
    • What accuracy is acceptable?
    • What are the cost/benefit tradeoffs?
    • Are there regulatory requirements?

    3. Iterate Incrementally

    Don’t expect perfection on the first generation. Use follow-up prompts:

    • “Add feature importance analysis”
    • “Try a gradient boosting approach”
    • “Optimize for faster inference time”
    • “Add cross-validation with 5 folds”

    4. Review Generated Code

    While the agent produces high-quality code, always review:

    • Data preprocessing logic for business rule compliance
    • Feature engineering for domain appropriateness
    • Model selection justification
    • Performance metrics alignment with business goals

    5. Establish Governance Guardrails

    Define organizational standards:

    • Required documentation templates
    • Mandatory model validation steps
    • Approved algorithm lists for regulated industries
    • Data privacy and security checks

    6. Combine Agent Automation with Human Expertise

    Use the agent for:

    • Rapid prototyping and baseline models
    • Automated preprocessing and feature engineering
    • Hyperparameter tuning and model selection
    • Code documentation and testing

    Retain human control for:

    • Problem formulation and success criteria
    • Business logic validation
    • Ethical considerations and bias assessment
    • Strategic decision-making on model deployment

    Measuring ROI: The Business Impact

    Organizations adopting Data Science Agent report significant benefits:

    Time-to-Production Acceleration

    Before Agent: Average 8-12 weeks from concept to production model

    With Agent: Average 1-2 weeks from concept to production model

    Impact: 5-10x faster model development cycles

    Productivity Multiplication

    Before Agent: 2-3 models per data scientist per quarter

    With Agent: 8-12 models per data scientist per quarter

    Impact: 4x increase in model output, enabling more AI use cases

    Quality Improvements

    Before Agent: 40-60% of models reach production (many abandoned due to insufficient ROI)

    With Agent: 70-85% of models reach production (faster iteration enables more refinement)

    Impact: Higher model quality through rapid experimentation

    Cost Optimization

    Before Agent: $150K-200K average cost per model (personnel time, infrastructure)

    With Agent: $40K-60K average cost per model

    Impact: 70% reduction in model development costs

    Democratization of ML

    Before Agent: Only senior data scientists can build production models

    With Agent: Junior analysts and citizen data scientists can create sophisticated models

    Impact: 3-5x expansion of AI capability across organization


    Limitations and Considerations

    While powerful, Data Science Agent has important constraints:

    Current Limitations

    Preview Status: Still in private preview; features and capabilities evolving

    Scope Boundaries: Optimized for structured data ML; deep learning and computer vision require different approaches

    Domain Knowledge: Agent lacks specific industry expertise; users must validate business logic

    Complex Custom Logic: Highly specialized algorithms may require manual implementation

    Important Considerations

    Data Quality Dependency: Agent’s output quality directly correlates with input data quality—garbage in, garbage out still applies

    Computational Costs: Automated hyperparameter tuning can consume significant compute resources

    Over-Reliance Risk: Organizations must maintain ML expertise; agents augment, not replace, human judgment

    Regulatory Compliance: In highly regulated industries, additional human review and validation required

    Bias and Fairness: Automated feature engineering may perpetuate existing biases; fairness testing essential


    The Future of Data Science Agent

    Based on Snowflake’s roadmap and industry trends, expect these developments:

    Future of autonomous ML operations with Snowflake Data Science Agent

    Short-Term (2025-2026)

    General Availability: Broader access as private preview graduates to GA

    Expanded Model Types: Support for time series, recommendation systems, and anomaly detection

    AutoML Enhancements: More sophisticated algorithm selection and ensemble methods

    Deeper Integration: Tighter coupling with Snowflake ML Jobs and model registry

    Medium-Term (2026-2027)

    Multi-Modal Learning: Support for unstructured data (images, text, audio) alongside structured data

    Federated Learning: Distributed model training across data clean rooms

    Automated Monitoring: Self-healing models that detect drift and retrain automatically

    Natural Language Insights: Plain English explanations of model behavior for business users

    Long-Term Vision (2027+)

    Autonomous ML Operations: End-to-end model lifecycle management with minimal human intervention

    Cross-Domain Transfer Learning: Agents that leverage learnings across industries and use cases

    Collaborative Multi-Agent Systems: Specialized agents working together on complex problems

    Causal ML Integration: Moving beyond correlation to causal inference and counterfactual analysis


    Getting Started with Data Science Agent

    Prerequisites

    To leverage Data Science Agent, you need:

    Snowflake Account: Enterprise edition or higher with Cortex AI enabled

    Data Foundation: Structured data in Snowflake tables or views

    Clear Use Case: Well-defined business problem with success metrics

    User Permissions: Access to Snowflake Notebooks and Cortex features

    Request Access

    Data Science Agent is currently in private preview:

    1. Contact your Snowflake account team to express interest
    2. Complete the preview application with use case details
    3. Participate in onboarding and training sessions
    4. Join the preview community for best practices sharing

    Pilot Project Selection

    Choose an initial use case with these characteristics:

    High Business Value: Clear ROI and stakeholder interest

    Data Availability: Clean, accessible data in Snowflake

    Reasonable Complexity: Not trivial, but not your most difficult problem

    Failure Tolerance: Low risk if the model needs iteration

    Measurement Clarity: Easy to quantify success

    Success Metrics

    Track these KPIs to measure Data Science Agent impact:

    • Time from concept to production model
    • Number of models per data scientist per quarter
    • Percentage of models reaching production
    • Model performance metrics vs. baseline
    • Cost per model developed
    • Data scientist satisfaction scores

    Snowflake Data Science Agent vs. Competitors

    How It Compares

    Databricks AutoML:

    • Advantage: Tighter integration with governed data, no data movement
    • Trade-off: Databricks offers more deep learning capabilities

    Google Cloud AutoML:

    • Advantage: Runs on your data warehouse, no egress costs
    • Trade-off: Google has broader pre-trained model library

    Amazon SageMaker Autopilot:

    • Advantage: Simpler for SQL-first organizations
    • Trade-off: AWS has more deployment flexibility

    H2O.ai Driverless AI:

    • Advantage: Native Snowflake integration, better governance
    • Trade-off: H2O specializes in AutoML with more tuning options

    Why Choose Snowflake Data Science Agent?

    Data Gravity: Build ML where your data lives—no movement, no copies, no security risks

    Unified Platform: Single environment for data engineering, analytics, and ML

    Enterprise Governance: Leverage existing security, compliance, and access controls

    Ecosystem Integration: Works seamlessly with BI tools, notebooks, and applications

    Scalability: Automatic compute scaling without infrastructure management


    Conclusion: The Data Science Revolution Begins Now

    The Snowflake Data Science Agent represents more than a productivity tool—it’s a fundamental reimagining of how organizations build machine learning solutions. By automating the 60-80% of work that consumes data scientists’ time, it unleashes their potential to solve harder problems, explore more use cases, and deliver greater business impact.

    The transformation is already beginning. Organizations in the private preview report 5-10x faster model development, 4x increases in productivity, and democratization of ML capabilities across their teams. As Data Science Agent reaches general availability in late 2025, these benefits will scale across the entire Snowflake ecosystem.

    The question isn’t whether to adopt AI-assisted data science—it’s how quickly you can implement it to stay competitive.

    For data leaders, the opportunity is clear: accelerate AI initiatives, multiply data science team output, and tackle the backlog of use cases that were previously too expensive or time-consuming to address.

    For data scientists, the promise is equally compelling: spend less time on repetitive tasks and more time on creative problem-solving, strategic thinking, and high-impact analysis.

    The future of data science is agentic. The future of data science is here.


    Key Takeaways

    • Snowflake Data Science Agent automates 60-80% of routine ML development work
    • Announced June 3, 2025, at Snowflake Summit; currently in private preview
    • Powered by Anthropic’s Claude AI running securely within Snowflake
    • Transforms weeks of ML pipeline work into hours through natural language interaction
    • Generates production-quality code for data prep, modeling, tuning, and evaluation
    • Organizations report 5-10x faster model development and 4x productivity gains
    • Use cases span financial services, healthcare, retail, manufacturing, and more
    • Maintains Snowflake’s enterprise governance, security, and compliance controls
    • Best used for structured data ML; human expertise still essential for strategy
    • Expected general availability in late 2025 with continued capability expansion